Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

match_dense confs on EfficientLoftr #443

Open
boyagesmile opened this issue Dec 9, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

match_dense confs on EfficientLoftr #443

boyagesmile opened this issue Dec 9, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@boyagesmile
Copy link

I got bad results when I try to test EfficientLoftr on aachen_v1.1 datasets by using the config:

    "loftr_aachen": {
        "output": "matches-loftr_aachen",
        "model": {"name": "loftr", "weights": "outdoor"},
        "preprocessing": {"grayscale": True, "resize_max": 1024, "dfactor": 8},
        "max_error": 2,  # max error for assigned keypoints (in px)
        "cell_size": 8,  # size of quantization patch (max 1 kp/patch)
    },

I wonder to know how to chagnge "max_error" and "cell_size". Do you have any plan to update the EfficinetLoftr test?

@Inverse-function
Copy link

Hello, I also want to test EfficientLoFTR, but I encountered an error where two tensor sizes do not match at the transformer position. How did you solve this? Or could you share your testing script with me? Thank you.

@boyagesmile
Copy link
Author

May be you should try to change "dfactor": 8 to "dfactor": 32

Hello, I also want to test EfficientLoFTR, but I encountered an error where two tensor sizes do not match at the transformer position. How did you solve this? Or could you share your testing script with me? Thank you.

@Inverse-function
Copy link

Thank you for your reply. Could you please explain what the "dfactor" parameter represents above?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants