You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Pydantic has this nice feature for generating JSON schemas from models.
It sounds like it would be a very good way to define Pipes types.
To be clear, the Python dagster-pipes package won't have to depend on pydantic. It would only be used to generate the schemas, which in turn could be used to implement and validate Pipes data structures across all programming languages.
Ideas of implementation
Should be straightforward
Additional information
Currently the JSON schemas live here. They should be moved to the main repo so that we can use them inside Dagster itself.
Message from the maintainers
Impacted by this issue? Give it a 👍! We factor engagement into prioritization.
What's the use case?
Pydantic has this nice feature for generating JSON schemas from models.
It sounds like it would be a very good way to define Pipes types.
To be clear, the Python
dagster-pipes
package won't have to depend onpydantic
. It would only be used to generate the schemas, which in turn could be used to implement and validate Pipes data structures across all programming languages.Ideas of implementation
Should be straightforward
Additional information
Currently the JSON schemas live here. They should be moved to the main repo so that we can use them inside Dagster itself.
Message from the maintainers
Impacted by this issue? Give it a 👍! We factor engagement into prioritization.
cc @cmpadden @marijncv @schrockn
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: