We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
It would be useful to report the percent bases below given quality cutoffs. Like:
fxstats -B 5,10,20 in.fq n_seq 13962380 n_bases 1047588337 mean_length 75.03 median_length 76.00 mean_read_quality 26.05 bases_below_Q5 1.23% bases_below_Q10 10.3% bases_below_Q20 20.3% ...
Useful to know how much data we throw away when filtering for base quality.
Basically we need an array similar to nt_counter in struct results. We iterate through the quality string and increment the corresponding char.
nt_counter
struct results
long baseq_counter[NCHARS] = {0}; // In function scan_file add count_nt(seq->quality.s, seq_len, results->baseq_counter);
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
It would be useful to report the percent bases below given quality cutoffs. Like:
Useful to know how much data we throw away when filtering for base quality.
Basically we need an array similar to
nt_counter
instruct results
. We iterate through the quality string and increment the corresponding char.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: