Add relationTypes for comments and replies #101
KellyStathis
started this conversation in
Metadata Schema Suggestions
Replies: 1 comment
-
I support this suggestion: we are to set up an open peer review pre-print server, where authors can (and should) reply to reviews: So far these resources have been hidden to the public, so that there was no need for a doi. But now that they are public and a) clearly an artefact in its own right and b) an important part of the review process, they should get a distinct DOI and be properly linked. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
What is the problem that your suggestion solves?
When registering DOIs for responses to reviews, there is not a clear choice of relationType to link the response to the review in the RelatedIdentifier field.
What solution might meet your needs?
Add relationTypes "IsCommentOn"/"HasComment" and/or "IsReplyTo"/"HasReply", or similar. This would align with Crossref's relationship types.
Your name
No response
Your organization
No response
What alternatives have you tried or considered?
Using the relationType "References", which is not specific.
Is there anything else you would like to share?
https://pidforum.org/t/commenting-reply-relation-types/3027/1
What group(s) would benefit from your suggestion?
If other group(s), please describe.
No response
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions