BOUNTY: Definition proposals for Minimum Viable Agents

[OWigginsHay]

Lots of strong conversation still going on about, assistant, tool building, and communication architectures. In order to make some of the ideas discussed around agent communication and communication structures and agent hierarchies more concrete. We need to agree what an gent in the system is and does. I have attempted to kick of the conversation with the MVA discussion, but let get on board. Lets walk before we can run, lets understand what our individual agents look like, and then use that to inform the Swarm structure.

MVA Discussion: #123
What Tools are use by MVA and what tools are local to assistant or global: #116
How does this impact: #93 (reply in thread)
Conversations between agents and agents/tools

[daveshap]

Might be helpful to provide links to relevant discussions and pulls

[OWigginsHay]

@daveshap started to populate, will add more as relevant or on request

[ARCIST-AI]

2311.02462.pdf
Hey guys @daveshap @OWigginsHay this documentation may be worth looking at for a knowledgebase or collaboration.

[OWigginsHay]

@alioop222 Thanks for dropping the link, can you provide a bit of context as to how or why this may be relevant regarding, knowledge base and collaborations? And if there is a specific section to look at regarding Agents as a single Unit in a Swarm?

[ARCIST-AI]

@OWigginsHay I thought it might be relevant in terms of the separations of behaviours between agents with differing authority. I havent had a chance to go through it yet, i just saw it and grabbed it. I didnt realise id have to apologise for bothering you @amartinez808
I was just trying to be helpful. Im quadruplegic so i struggle to use keyboards or sit still to concentrate on long text. Use it if you want, dont use it, whatever.

[OWigginsHay]

Well thanks @alioop222 was just looking for clarification on link to the title. Will check out and use if relevant. Don't be worried about contributing, we just have to make sure discussion is on topic