Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

explain how to enable the PM team of a database to get telemetry data about dbt invocation volume #1625

Closed
1 task done
dataders opened this issue Jun 28, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed
1 task done

explain how to enable the PM team of a database to get telemetry data about dbt invocation volume #1625

dataders opened this issue Jun 28, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees
@dataders
Labels
adapters content Improvements or additions to content icebox For issues we're closing but will revisit at a future date if possible! improvement Use this when an area of the docs needs improvement as it's currently unclear priority: low Improves docs but doesn’t block workflows, like grammar fixes & nice to haves

Comments

@dataders
Copy link
Contributor

dataders commented Jun 28, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Contributions

  • I have read the contribution docs, and understand what's expected of me.

Link to the page on docs.getdbt.com requiring updates

https://docs.getdbt.com/docs/contributing/building-a-new-adapter#opencls-connection

What part(s) of the page would you like to see updated?

specifically the section about ConnectionManager.open() should at least note that the developer should consider the possibility of logging the adapter version via the connection information when opening a Connection

https://github.com/dbt-labs/docs.getdbt.com/blame/current/website/docs/docs/contributing/building-a-new-adapter.md#L150-L165

Additional information

related to dbt-labs/dbt-database-adapter-scaffold#41

No response
@dataders dataders added content Improvements or additions to content improvement Use this when an area of the docs needs improvement as it's currently unclear labels Jun 28, 2022
@dataders dataders self-assigned this Jun 28, 2022
@runleonarun
Copy link
Collaborator

@dataders Is this still valid? Should I close an put in the #icebox?

@runleonarun runleonarun added the priority: low Improves docs but doesn’t block workflows, like grammar fixes & nice to haves label Jun 16, 2023
@mirnawong1 mirnawong1 added the icebox For issues we're closing but will revisit at a future date if possible! label Nov 25, 2024
@mirnawong1
Copy link
Contributor

adding an icebox label and closing issue. we can reopen if needed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@dataders dataders

Labels
adapters content Improvements or additions to content icebox For issues we're closing but will revisit at a future date if possible! improvement Use this when an area of the docs needs improvement as it's currently unclear priority: low Improves docs but doesn’t block workflows, like grammar fixes & nice to haves
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@runleonarun @dataders @mirnawong1