We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
URN is for books and standards. To use for for GQL path/url is just wrong.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/57446486/name-of-the-portion-of-a-url-that-follows-the-scheme https://stackoverflow.com/a/38204721/710069 https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3986#section-4.2
The closest idea is relative reference of URL, but it contains // which we don't use in GQL_URN env.
//
Other variations:
UriWithoutSchema UrlWithoutSchema AuthorityWithPath SCHEMELESS_URL
And may be we should use even better way to do it: deep-foundation/hasura#15 (this way may be optional)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@ivansglazunov do you have arguments against breaking change here?
Sorry, something went wrong.
Konard
No branches or pull requests
URN is for books and standards. To use for for GQL path/url is just wrong.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/57446486/name-of-the-portion-of-a-url-that-follows-the-scheme
https://stackoverflow.com/a/38204721/710069
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3986#section-4.2
The closest idea is relative reference of URL, but it contains
//
which we don't use in GQL_URN env.Other variations:
And may be we should use even better way to do it: deep-foundation/hasura#15 (this way may be optional)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: