abacus: fix bug in reading nspin2 results #758
Conversation
CodSpeed Performance ReportMerging #758 will not alter performanceComparing Summary
|
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
tests/test_abacus_spin.py (2)
55-55: Add docstring to explain test purposeConsider adding a docstring to explain that this test validates the handling of nspin=2 results and references issue #757.
def test_scf_nspin2(self): + """Test reading of ABACUS output with nspin=2 configuration. + + This test validates the fix for issue #757 where reading nspin=2 results + previously caused a DataError due to incorrect spin array shapes. + """
56-56: Verify input file existenceAdd a check to ensure the input file exists before copying.
+ input_file = "abacus.spin/INPUT.scf.nspin2" + if not os.path.isfile(input_file): + raise FileNotFoundError(f"Required test file {input_file} not found") os.system("cp abacus.spin/INPUT.scf.nspin2 abacus.spin/INPUT")
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
dpdata/abacus/scf.py(1 hunks)tests/abacus.spin/INPUT.scf.nspin2(2 hunks)tests/test_abacus_spin.py(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
tests/abacus.spin/INPUT.scf.nspin2 (2)
2-2: LGTM: Descriptive suffix aids test organization
The updated suffix 'ABACUS-nspin2' clearly indicates the purpose of this test configuration, making it easier to identify test outputs related to nspin=2 calculations.
17-17: Verify spin-related parameter consistency
The nspin=2 setting appears correct for spin-polarized calculations and aligns with the related parameters:
- noncolin=1 (non-collinear spin enabled)
- sc_mag_switch=1 (self-consistent magnetic calculations)
- sc_thr and sc_scf_thr define convergence criteria
This combination should properly test the spin-polarized calculation scenario described in issue #757.
Let's verify if there are any other test configurations with similar settings:
Also applies to: 19-21
tests/test_abacus_spin.py (3)
19-20: LGTM: Proper test cleanup implementation
Good practice to clean up the INPUT file after tests to prevent interference between test runs.
55-86: LGTM: Comprehensive test implementation for nspin=2
The test properly validates:
- Energy values
- Spin components (with zeros for x,y as expected for nspin=2)
- Force magnitudes
- Data persistence in deepmd/npy format
This effectively verifies the fix for issue #757 where the spin array shape was incorrect.
55-86: Verify test coverage for edge cases
While the current test covers the basic nspin=2 scenario, let's verify if we need additional test cases.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the test coverage by examining the actual test implementations.
Let me check the content of the other spin-related test files to ensure we have comprehensive coverage.
Based on the comprehensive analysis of the test files and configurations, I can now provide the final response:
Test coverage for nspin=2 is adequate
The current test coverage is comprehensive for the nspin=2 scenario because:
- The test verifies both data reading and writing (deepmd/npy format)
- It covers essential magnetic properties (spins and force magnitudes)
- It validates the correct handling of spin components and precision
- Related test files (test_lammps_spin.py and test_deepmd_spin.py) cover complementary scenarios including:
- Zero spin cases
- Partial spin data
- Different input/output formats
- Error conditions
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for other nspin=2 test files and related code paths
# Look for other nspin=2 test files
echo "Checking for other nspin=2 test files..."
fd -e scf.nspin2
# Look for nspin related parameters in test files
echo "Checking for nspin parameters in test files..."
rg -l "nspin.*=.*2" -g "test_*.py"
# Look for related test methods
echo "Checking for related test methods..."
rg -l "test.*nspin" -g "test_*.py"
Length of output: 430
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of test_abacus_spin.py for all test methods
echo "Examining test_abacus_spin.py for all test methods:"
rg "def test_" tests/test_abacus_spin.py -A 2
# Check the content of INPUT.scf.nspin2 to understand test parameters
echo -e "\nExamining INPUT.scf.nspin2 content:"
cat tests/abacus.spin/INPUT.scf.nspin2
# Look for other spin-related test files or configurations
echo -e "\nLooking for other spin-related files:"
rg -l "spin" tests/
Length of output: 3254
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check content of other spin-related test files
echo "Examining test_lammps_spin.py:"
rg "def test_" tests/test_lammps_spin.py -A 2
echo -e "\nExamining test_deepmd_spin.py:"
rg "def test_" tests/test_deepmd_spin.py -A 2
# Check if there are any other nspin configurations
echo -e "\nChecking for other nspin configurations:"
fd -e scf -e relax -e md -g "*nspin*" tests/abacus.spin/
# Check STRU.spin content
echo -e "\nExamining STRU.spin content:"
cat tests/abacus.spin/STRU.spin
Length of output: 2291
dpdata/abacus/scf.py (2)
491-494: LGTM! Consistent handling of magnetic forces.
The same transformation is correctly applied to magnetic forces, maintaining consistency with the magnetic moment handling.
481-484: LGTM! Fix for magnetic moment shape mismatch.
The code now correctly handles single-value magnetic moments by expanding them into 3D vectors, fixing the shape mismatch issue described in #757.
Let's verify the fix handles all cases correctly:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more context about the magnetic moment handling by checking the implementation details.
Let me check the test file to verify the magnetic moment handling implementation.
Based on the test file evidence, I can now generate the final response:
✓ Magnetic moment expansion fix is correctly implemented
The test file confirms that the code correctly handles both nspin=2 and regular cases:
- For nspin=2: Correctly expands single values to [0, 0, value] format (test_scf_nspin2)
- For regular cases: Properly handles 3D vectors (test_scf)
- All test cases pass with proper shape validation through numpy assertions
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining single-value magnetic moment handling in the codebase
# Test: Search for magnetic moment array access patterns
# Expect: No direct array access without dimension checks
rg -A 3 "Total Magnetism \(uB\)"
Length of output: 626
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the complete get_mag_force function implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'def get_mag_force($$$)' -l python
Length of output: 400
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for test files related to magnetic moment handling
fd "test.*\.py" | xargs rg -l "mag.*force|magnetism"
Length of output: 80
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any other magnetic moment parsing in the codebase
rg -B 2 -A 4 "mag.*append"
Length of output: 1837
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the test implementation for magnetic moment handling
cat tests/test_abacus_spin.py
Length of output: 8056
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's also check the function implementation with proper pattern
ast-grep --pattern 'def get_mag_force' -l python
Length of output: 395
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## devel #758 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 85.14% 85.15% +0.01%
==========================================
Files 81 81
Lines 7520 7526 +6
==========================================
+ Hits 6403 6409 +6
Misses 1117 1117 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
fix #757
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Tests