You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In order to not having to write a repeating composition of views every time it is used, provide a binder that enables binding composed views. This is similar to defining a function and requires a signature and body Since the body does not contain sequencing, we write = instead of a function body { .. }.
view view_name<generic_args: k...>(param_name:T, ..., input_view:[[U; n]]) -> T = input_view.v.v...
Parameters can have a data type or a view-function type.
The last parameter must be for the array view that is transformed. It therefore has an array view type.
Special syntax definition for view function body?
introduce type checking rule for composition of (view) functions .?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In order to not having to write a repeating composition of views every time it is used, provide a binder that enables binding composed views. This is similar to defining a function and requires a signature and body Since the body does not contain sequencing, we write
=
instead of a function body{ .. }
..
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: