You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
CBMC version: "develop" branch commit c193c27, built on 27th August 2024
Operating system: EC2/Ubuntu Linux
Exact command line resulting in the issue: "make result"
What behaviour did you expect: Successful proof with 0 warnings and 0 errors.
What happened instead: 2 warnings, possibly spurious.
Proof of the function s2n_stuffer_read_hex() from the fork at https://github.com/rod-chapman/s2n-tls,
on branch "unbound_stuffer_read_hex" at commit [e307312].
Proof succeeds OK, but generates two confusing warnings:
file <builtin-library-tolower> line 4: 'tolower'
old definition in module s2n_blob file /usr/include/ctype.h line 122
signed int (signed int __c, __CPROVER_contracts_write_set_ptr_t __write_set_to_check)
new definition in module <built-in-library> file <builtin-library-tolower> line 4
signed int (signed int c)
file <builtin-library-strcasecmp> line 9: 'strcasecmp'
old definition in module s2n_errno file /usr/include/strings.h line 116
signed int (const char *__s1, const char *__s2, __CPROVER_contracts_write_set_ptr_t __write_set_to_check)
new definition in module <built-in-library> file <builtin-library-strcasecmp> line 9
signed int (const char *s1, const char *s2)
It is rather non-obvious what's going wrong here, and if these really are a problem or not. Will cause confusion and anxiety for users.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
CBMC version: "develop" branch commit c193c27, built on 27th August 2024
Operating system: EC2/Ubuntu Linux
Exact command line resulting in the issue: "make result"
What behaviour did you expect: Successful proof with 0 warnings and 0 errors.
What happened instead: 2 warnings, possibly spurious.
Proof of the function s2n_stuffer_read_hex() from the fork at https://github.com/rod-chapman/s2n-tls,
on branch "unbound_stuffer_read_hex" at commit [e307312].
Proof succeeds OK, but generates two confusing warnings:
It is rather non-obvious what's going wrong here, and if these really are a problem or not. Will cause confusion and anxiety for users.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: