Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Incompatibility between torsocks and Cosmopolitan #24

Open
dinosaure opened this issue Nov 18, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Incompatibility between torsocks and Cosmopolitan #24

dinosaure opened this issue Nov 18, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone
Version 1.0.0

Comments

@dinosaure
Copy link
Owner

It seems that the Cosmopolitan binary can be wrapped into torsocks. I think that torsocks introspects some syscalls but Cosmopolitan obfuscates syscalls.
@dinosaure
Copy link
Owner Author

@reynir said that we probably provide a socks implementation and ocaml-socks is a good candidate for that. I will try to discuss about ownership of this library to be able to keep the control of all dependencies needed by bob.

@dinosaure
Copy link
Owner Author

I took the ownership on ocaml-socks which means that I'm able to provide something for SOCKSv4/v5 now and let people to redirect the Bob connection into a Tor node!

@dinosaure dinosaure added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 11, 2024
@dinosaure
Copy link
Owner Author

Fixed by #49

@dinosaure dinosaure added this to the Version 1.0.0 milestone Jan 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Version 1.0.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@dinosaure