Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

When choosing OCaml as the syntax we still get many Reason files #116

Open
smondet opened this issue Oct 2, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

When choosing OCaml as the syntax we still get many Reason files #116

smondet opened this issue Oct 2, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@smondet
Copy link

smondet commented Oct 2, 2024 

vitethen/src/
vitethen/src/bindings
vitethen/src/bindings/bindings.ml
vitethen/src/bindings/dune
vitethen/src/bindings/browser.ml
vitethen/src/dune
vitethen/src/components
vitethen/src/components/components.re
vitethen/src/components/dune
vitethen/src/components/Configuration.re
vitethen/src/cma_configuration
vitethen/src/cma_configuration/bundler.ml
vitethen/src/cma_configuration/dune
vitethen/src/cma_configuration/cma_configuration.ml
vitethen/src/cma_configuration/node_package_manager.ml
vitethen/src/cma_configuration/configuration.ml
vitethen/src/App.re
@davesnx
Copy link
Collaborator

davesnx commented Nov 5, 2024

What would you do for JSX stuff, use OCaml syntax as well or go with mlx in this case?

@davesnx davesnx mentioned this issue Nov 5, 2024
Open
@smondet
Copy link
Author

smondet commented Nov 5, 2024

@davesnx not sure, it's just quite surprising to get reason there. MLX would make sense for newcommers I think yes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@smondet @davesnx