Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 15, 2018. It is now read-only.

Improve ltsp-manager #2

Open
dashohoxha opened this issue Apr 13, 2018 · 4 comments
Open

Improve ltsp-manager #2

dashohoxha opened this issue Apr 13, 2018 · 4 comments
Labels
optional It is OK if this task is not completed.

Comments

@dashohoxha
Copy link
Member

Experiment with ltsp-manager.

Do we need to build a Debian package for ltsp-manager?
What features can be added to ltsp-manager to make it more flexible and more easy to use?

@vagrantc
Copy link

There is already a package in Debian experimental: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ltsp-manager

@dashohoxha
Copy link
Member Author

@vagrantc thanks for your comment.
Actually @d78ui98 has noticed that there is already such a package for Debian, and we have agreed that this is Ok (no need to build a new package).

About improving ltsp-manager, I am thinking about automating some tasks that usually need some manual changes to configuration files. For example enabling guest login on ltsp clients, enabling auto-login on ltsp clients, etc.

Another improvement is configuring automatically the server to support RaspberryPi clients. Most probably this will require a thin client configuration of the LTSP server.

@dashohoxha
Copy link
Member Author

The code of ltsp-manager: https://git.launchpad.net/ltsp-manager/tree/share/ltsp-manager

@d78ui98 I think that you don't have much experience with Python programming (and neither do I), so it can be difficult for you to change and improve ltsp-manager in the remaining time of the project (about one month). So, maybe we should leave out this task, and it can possibly be a topic for another GSoC project. What do you think?

@d78ui98
Copy link
Contributor

d78ui98 commented Jul 7, 2018

Yes, It will probably be the best.

@dashohoxha dashohoxha added the optional It is OK if this task is not completed. label Jul 11, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
optional It is OK if this task is not completed.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants