You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Implement a minimal viable smart contract for a hackathon voting DAO.
A complete description of the DAO can be found in the Medium article:
Here is the list of features to implement:
There are three roles: hackathon admin, hackathon BUIDL (project), hackathon judge.
Every DAO has a bank. Hackathon prizes can be injected into the DAO bank. Multiple ERC-20 tokens can be injected into the DAO bank.
Admins can add judges to the DAO.
A registrar as an entry to all BUIDLs
Every judge has three votes. A judge can vote for any project, and every project can receive more than one judge votes.
Every BUIDL team has three votes. BUIDL teams can vote for any project except their own projects. Every project can receive more than one team votes.
Every admin can approve or remove a BUIDL from the registrar.
When the hackathon ends, admin can close voting process, the DAO calculates every BUIDL's total votes and percentage votes (buidl_votes / total_votes).
BUIDL teams can claim prizes and take back a basket of tokens.
The bounty hacker needs to implement all features above and help with frontend integration.
Implement a minimal viable smart contract for a hackathon voting DAO.
A complete description of the DAO can be found in the Medium article:
Here is the list of features to implement:
The bounty hacker needs to implement all features above and help with frontend integration.
High-quality code and documentation is required. Code submit to Dora Factory (https://github.com/DoraFactory).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: