Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Edit Contentlet: Replace Current Binary Field with webcomponent #26053

Closed
Tracked by #25445
rjvelazco opened this issue Sep 11, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed
Tracked by #25445

Edit Contentlet: Replace Current Binary Field with webcomponent #26053

rjvelazco opened this issue Sep 11, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@rjvelazco
Copy link
Contributor

Parent Issue

#26047

Task

As a dotCMS user, I have a requirement to utilize the new binary field functionality. To accomplish this, it is necessary to replace the existing .jsp binary field with the implementation of the new binary field.

Proposed Objective

Core Features

Proposed Priority

Priority 3 - Average

Acceptance Criteria

  • Should not break current functionality

External Links... Slack Conversations, Support Tickets, Figma Designs, etc.

No response

Assumptions & Initiation Needs

You can find the component in the .jsp file at the following location: edit_field.jsp.

In order to use the component in the .jsp world, it is necessary to build the corresponding .js file.

Quality Assurance Notes & Workarounds

No response

Sub-Tasks & Estimates

No response

@fmontes fmontes changed the title Content Edit Refactor: Replace Current Binary Field with webcomponent Edit Contentlet: Replace Current Binary Field with webcomponent Sep 18, 2023
@fmontes fmontes moved this from New to Current Sprint Backlog in dotCMS - Product Planning Oct 31, 2023
@fmontes
Copy link
Member

fmontes commented Oct 31, 2023

Done in other place.

@fmontes fmontes closed this as completed Oct 31, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Current Sprint Backlog to Done in dotCMS - Product Planning Oct 31, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants