Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

ChangeParametersRefactorChangeFactory - Handle to varargs argument better? #23

Open
dozmus opened this issue Jul 20, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

ChangeParametersRefactorChangeFactory - Handle to varargs argument better? #23

dozmus opened this issue Jul 20, 2018 · 0 comments
Labels
csar-java defect Something isn't working, but it's 'intentional'

Comments

@dozmus
Copy link
Owner

dozmus commented Jul 20, 2018

Suppose we transform the parameters as follows: (float a, float b) -> (float... f).
It may make sense to not modify the method call arguments of said method, since they are still compatible.
@dozmus dozmus added defect Something isn't working, but it's 'intentional' csar-java labels Jul 20, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
csar-java defect Something isn't working, but it's 'intentional'
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@dozmus