You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you so much for developing this great tool! My colleague recommended bwa-meth and MethylDackel to me.
Recently we developed a haplotype-resolved diploid human genome, where one copy is paternal and the other copy is maternal. I imagine if I map WGBS data to this diploid reference genome with bwa-meth, most reads will have secondary alignment with MAQ0 due to the high similarity of pat-/mat-genome. From reading the previous posts and the alignment flags, I got the impression that secondary alignment will be discarded (#25 (comment)), I am just wondering whether it is possible to set MAPQ >= 0 with -q and retain all reads with secondary alignment and only use the primary alignment (which I assume is randomly assigned?) for calculating the methylation percentage please?
Thank you very much!
Best Regards,
Zhe
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dear Devon,
Thank you so much for developing this great tool! My colleague recommended bwa-meth and MethylDackel to me.
Recently we developed a haplotype-resolved diploid human genome, where one copy is paternal and the other copy is maternal. I imagine if I map WGBS data to this diploid reference genome with bwa-meth, most reads will have secondary alignment with MAQ0 due to the high similarity of pat-/mat-genome. From reading the previous posts and the alignment flags, I got the impression that secondary alignment will be discarded (#25 (comment)), I am just wondering whether it is possible to set MAPQ >= 0 with -q and retain all reads with secondary alignment and only use the primary alignment (which I assume is randomly assigned?) for calculating the methylation percentage please?
Thank you very much!
Best Regards,
Zhe
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: