You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, I noticed that the range parameter names for accessibility are wrong way around.
It conflicts with the statements in the documentation that zero is MOST accessible."
"accessibility
A factor describing how possible an event is to do with zero being the most accessible
[0.0, 1.0]"
You can check it when using only 1 of the range parameters.
"MAXaccessibility"is actually the MINIMUM value up until zero (0).
and "MINaccessibility"is actually the MAXIMUM value up from one (1).
You wouldn't notice this when using both MINaccessibility and MAXaccessibility in one request, because then they are interchangeable.
Please ccorrect this issue.
(And notify my, because I now changed my frond-end to work with the reversed order)
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @redfiretim, thanks for your interest in the project! This is an issue that was noted in a previous issue, it just hasn't been top priority as efforts have instead been focused on developing a v2 API and rewriting the entire frontend.
This shouldn't be a difficult fix and I can definitely look at it when I get a chance, but it might be a bit before I can due to how busy I am with my other commitments. Feel free to submit a PR if time is of the essence and I'd be appreciative and more than willing to review it.
Hi, I noticed that the range parameter names for accessibility are wrong way around.
It conflicts with the statements in the documentation that zero is MOST accessible."
"accessibility
A factor describing how possible an event is to do with zero being the most accessible
[0.0, 1.0]"
You can check it when using only 1 of the range parameters.
"MAXaccessibility"is actually the MINIMUM value up until zero (0).
and "MINaccessibility"is actually the MAXIMUM value up from one (1).
You wouldn't notice this when using both MINaccessibility and MAXaccessibility in one request, because then they are interchangeable.
Please ccorrect this issue.
(And notify my, because I now changed my frond-end to work with the reversed order)
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: