You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The works extension includes a few classes that represent ordering and alternate structures:
AlternateOrder: an alternate ordering of its parent's members. It should only order the parent's members, and otherwise has all of the features of ordering (some members may be omitted from the order, members may appear more than once in the order, etc.)
TopRange: logical ordering of the component parts of an object, corresponding to a IIIF Range with the "top" viewing hint
Range: a section of a Work, corresponding to a IIIF Range
These classes were added to support multiple orders and "logical order" (such as a Table of Contents or other overlay on top of the primary structure of an Object).
Should we add the AlternateOrder, TopRange, and Range classes to the core ontology?
The works extension includes a few classes that represent ordering and alternate structures:
These classes were added to support multiple orders and "logical order" (such as a Table of Contents or other overlay on top of the primary structure of an Object).
Should we add the AlternateOrder, TopRange, and Range classes to the core ontology?
See #53 for preliminary discussion.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: