-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
is "overlubricatio" really a word? #166
Comments
Technically it is a word, but eh. |
what does it mean? where have you heard this word? it's not in the Oxford dictionary, it's not in Urban dictionary, it's not in https://en.wiktionary.org , and i've never heard of it before |
It maybe a typo? |
also run scripts/gen.sh , it seemingly hasn't been executed in quite some time: - the current gen.sh create "words.txt.zip" while seemingly previous versions generated "words.zip" instead - there were quite some words in words.txt that seemingly wasn't sorted properly (gen.sh sorts them)
made a PR removing the word: #185 |
that's definitive, OVERLUBRICATIO is not a word, it's a spelling error. Signed Word Ways |
Found a better link. In the current link, it refers to the previous article for Further Websterian Errors. I found it https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/62421168.pdf |
sure "overlubrication" and "overlubricate" are words, but is "overlubricatio" really a word?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: