-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 95
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Code after Javadocs still folded "too much" #1992
Comments
Also, it seems like that PR changes the test in #1960 to only consider the "new"/experimental folding and does not run any tests with the "old" folding (I expected it to run tests with both options). @jakub-suliga Is this intentional? |
Also @jjohnstn since you reviewed the PR in question, I think you should know about that as well. |
If the second method starts in the same line the first one ends then there will still be 2 foldings. Fixes eclipse-jdt#1992
If the second method starts in the same line the first one ends then there will still be 2 foldings. Fixes eclipse-jdt#1992
No, it isnt intentional. I fixed it in #1993 |
If the second method starts in the same line the first one ends then there will still be 2 foldings. Fixes eclipse-jdt#1992
If the second method starts in the same line the first one ends then there will still be 2 foldings. Fixes eclipse-jdt#1992
If the second method starts in the same line the first one ends then there will still be 2 foldings. Fixes eclipse-jdt#1992
While testing #1825, I noticed the following issue:
In #1562, @jakub-suliga introduced the fix for #1939 (see this comment) but there seems to be a case where this issue still happens.
With the following code, folding
a()
causesb()
to be invisible as well in the current master (after merging #1562) if the new/experimental folding is disabled:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: