-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 116
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move createProblemMarker() to AbstractProjectConfigurator and clean up #975
Open
HannesWell
wants to merge
1
commit into
eclipse-m2e:master
Choose a base branch
from
HannesWell:problemMarker
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+62
−72
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could the IMarker be returned here?
What if one wants to create the marker on the value of the element? Can't we give it a text position instead, and an helper to locate an element in a mojoExecution?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In general
IMavenMarkerManager
could be changed to return the marker too.Creating the marker at the value is not yet supported, but in general could be considered.
Yes Christoph suggested that as well before.
And after some rethinking about it, it is probably the better way for a generalization because IIRC for markers of custom Ids m2e just creates them using the Eclipse Resources API. So there is no benefit in providing an extra API for that. But I have to check that again.
However I think for a simple case a convenient API method like this would be useful nevertheless.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is uncertainity with this API that needs to be covered before it can be claimed "API-quality" (ie we won't want to change it for a long time), and this comes by nature of using the "element" name:
All those questions wouldn't be raised if we clearly separate locating the marker vs creating it. If it is clear that locating the marker is the important part, and not creating it (because Platform API is enough), then instead of API to create a marker, we should have an API to reoslve locations and use already existing satisfying APIs from Platform to create it.