-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 177
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
unnecessary warning for exposure_schema_validity test #1708
Comments
Hi @data-blade ! It may take us a bit of time to get to so if you're willing to contribute a fix will be happy to point to give pointers on where to look. |
@haritamar's observation is correct and hints at the root cause. but since this bug never received any love and we're now automating our test coverage, we have to replace broken elementary with proprietary tests. here it is, if anybody is interested note this assumes
|
Describe the bug
given
exposure_a
andexposure_b
,each with just
model_x
in theirdepends_on
,each only specifying
column_name
.running
exposure_schema_validity
will yield this warning for each exposure and columnTo Reproduce
create a simple setup with
exposure_a
,exposure_b
andmodel_x
as described aboveExpected behavior
no warning, since
model_x
is the only model in thedepends_on
of each exposure, therefore nonode
property should be neededScreenshots
n/a
Environment
Additional context
the test passes despite the warning
Would you be willing to contribute a fix for this issue?
if time allows
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: