Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature suggestion: ignore certain errors #117

Open
craigfurman opened this issue Dec 12, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Feature suggestion: ignore certain errors #117

craigfurman opened this issue Dec 12, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@craigfurman
Copy link

👋 My team recently started using this project, and we're definitely enjoying it so far. One UX issue we do have though, is that our workflow can't quite be expressed using the current status values (resolved and unresolved). I think that another possible state, "ignored", with the ability to filter the errors page to omit these, would solve this for us. A bit more detail on our workflow below 👇

We integrate with the telemetry to notify ourselves when a new or regressed (resolved -> unresolved) error occurs. We don't notify on subsequent instances of known errors. Zooming out, we use error-tracker to quickly alert us to new kinds of error, for triage, in conjunction with metrics-based alerting on a moving-average error ratio (e.g. "alert when >1% of HTTP responses on an endpoint have status 5XX in the last 30 minutes"). We believe balances MTTD with a workable signal:noise ratio.

As such, we tend to leave error-tracker entries related to transient, retryable errors (e.g. network flakes) open. This isn't because we don't care about them as such, but rather that a very low ratio of such errors, below some low percentage threshold, doesn't meet the urgency criteria to alert. Leaving the error-tracker entry open (unresolved) results in the notification behaviour we want (i.e. not notifying us).

I'd be interested in marking such entries as "ignored" in order to de-clutter the front page of error-tracker, which would make triaging of new entries easier.

Is this something you'd be interested in as a maintainer? I'd be happy to send a PR if so.

Cheers!
Craig

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant