-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 323
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove \
from IR.Type.Set
but support &
#6165
Comments
You are right. The syntax |
OK. Let's remove |
Yes, we should keep them. |
\
in IR.Type.Set
in the new parser
\
in IR.Type.Set
in the new parser\
in IR.Type.Set
from the parser
\
in IR.Type.Set
from the parser\
from IR.Type.Set
but support &
Jaroslav Tulach reports a new STANDUP for yesterday (2023-09-08): Progress: - PR: #7769
Next Day: Bugfixing |
Jaroslav Tulach reports a new STANDUP for yesterday (2023-09-11): Progress: - removing \ supporting & integrated: #7769
Next Day: Bugfixing |
There are some
SugaredTypeFunctionsTest
that deal with support for sets(!?) and produceIR.Type.Set
. Some of the operations seem to be working (likeT & P
orT | P
) but some of them aren't. Particularly theT \ P
syntax seems to contradict with the "new syntax for lambdas".Please take a look at
SugaredTypeFunctionsTest
three failing tests:and decide whether such tests are supposed to be fixed or deleted. Thanks for your help.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: