-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Relaxed on requirement for parameters.txt #226
Comments
Sorry that you haven't gotten any response on this. From the code you refer to, it seems like an empty dataframe is returned, and not that it crashes. That makes sense to me: no data -> blank output? the alternative is to maybe still add the realization column and nothing else. |
But: Even for restarts / prediction runs it is generally recommended to add uncertainty.
|
Ideally, it will be great if it loads the result per realization into the data frame instead of returning empty data frame because these data are needed for the plugin. fmu-ensemble/src/fmu/ensemble/ensemble.py Lines 486 to 520 in d63a380
In fmu-drogon, we have created a forward model that transfer the parameters.txt from history (equinor/fmu-drogon@a7aa6d5), but I just think it will be great that we can still support the runs that are already performed (without this new forward model) |
In some cases, we run prediction using restart file from other ensembles. For example in Drogon, we have a prediction run that is based on iter-3 of automatic history matching (AHM) model. For these cases, there won't be parameters.txt in the RUNPATH. FMU Ensemble will not read the data from those cases and causing crash in Webviz plugin StructuralUncertainty.
I have tried to put an empty parameters.txt and the plugin seems to work fine.
So, I am suggesting to relaxed the requirement for parameters.txt in this code
fmu-ensemble/src/fmu/ensemble/ensemble.py
Lines 410 to 422 in d63a380
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: