Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider changing insert_proposals to work with bleeding #434

Open
kvashchuka opened this issue Jan 19, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Consider changing insert_proposals to work with bleeding #434

kvashchuka opened this issue Jan 19, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@kvashchuka
Copy link
Contributor

kvashchuka commented Jan 19, 2024

Currently insert_proposals supports only release names in the format year.month.version. However, it could support bleeding as well

@jonathan-eq
Copy link
Collaborator

I am not sure if we need this after all. I guess insert_proposals is mainly used for non-RMs to upgrade packages as there is less chance to mess something up rather than upgrading the package directly. Upgrade-proposals makes it possible to batch together updates from different teams as they see fit, and then we roll out all the upgrades together.
As I understand it, only (or mainly) RMs should touch bleeding, and it would be more work to go through upgrade proposals. (you would need someone to accept your PR, instead of just running bleeding directly from your branch containing the bleeding upgrades)

@eivindjahren eivindjahren added the christmas-review Issues and PRs for Christmas review label Dec 13, 2024
@jonathan-eq jonathan-eq removed the christmas-review Issues and PRs for Christmas review label Dec 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants