Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Archive/Delete this project? #1

Open
katrinleinweber opened this issue Aug 11, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Archive/Delete this project? #1

katrinleinweber opened this issue Aug 11, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@katrinleinweber
Copy link

katrinleinweber commented Aug 11, 2022

There is a structural mismatch between the hub repo's dummy-package

espanso-hub/packages $ exa --tree dummy-package
dummy-package
└── 0.1.0
   ├── _manifest.yml
   ├── package.yml
   └── README.md

… and this repo:

espanso/dummy-repository $ exa --tree dummy-package
dummy-package
├── _manifest.yml
├── package.yml
└── README.md

The latter is implied by:


But the former is correct as per https://espanso.org/docs/packages/creating-a-package/#publish-on-the-hub-public and all hub packages seem to comply:

espanso-hub/packages $ exa --tree --level=2  | rg '│  └── ' | sort | uniq
│  └── 0.1.0	│  └── 0.1.1	│  └── 0.1.2	│  └── 0.2.0	│  └── 0.2.1
│  └── 1.0.0	│  └── 1.7.0	│  └── 2.0.0	│  └── 2.0.1

Another but: Both structures seems to work with Espanso v2.1.6-beta.

Therefore

  1. Should this dummy-repository be archived or deleted or its ReadMe clarified?
  2. Does that version subfolder need to be mentioned in Package format, in a nutshell? Or is it a special case of the multiple versions format which however, everyone on the hub uses at this time?
@AucaCoyan
Copy link
Member

Hi!
Thank you for your dedicated issue 🤩. Yes, a lot of time has passed an this repo should be archived.

I'm many repos of the espanso org, but this is not one of them. Permissions 😋.
When the moment comes, we will archive the repo!
Thanks again for the descriptive issue

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants