Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: use require.NoError instead of t.Fatal(err) in client package #18705

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 10, 2024

Conversation

mmorel-35
Copy link
Contributor

@mmorel-35 mmorel-35 commented Oct 8, 2024

There is no linter for this.
This uses testify instead of testing for
With

require.NoError(t, err)

require.Error(t, err)

instead of

if err != nil {
    t.Fatal(err)
}


if err == nil {
    t.Fatal(err)
}

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link

Hi @mmorel-35. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a etcd-io member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Oct 8, 2024

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 68.71%. Comparing base (17fb752) to head (da91de6).
Report is 11 commits behind head on main.

Current head da91de6 differs from pull request most recent head 3343dc8

Please upload reports for the commit 3343dc8 to get more accurate results.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files

see 24 files with indirect coverage changes

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #18705      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   68.84%   68.71%   -0.13%     
==========================================
  Files         420      420              
  Lines       35540    35540              
==========================================
- Hits        24466    24421      -45     
- Misses       9651     9691      +40     
- Partials     1423     1428       +5     

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 17fb752...3343dc8. Read the comment docs.

@mmorel-35
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign @wenjiaswe

@ahrtr
Copy link
Member

ahrtr commented Oct 8, 2024

Thanks for the PR. Please try not raise huge PR. Please try to breakdown this PR, thx

@mmorel-35
Copy link
Contributor Author

One PR per first level folder shall be enough ?

@ahrtr
Copy link
Member

ahrtr commented Oct 8, 2024

One PR per first level folder shall be enough ?

works for me

@mmorel-35 mmorel-35 force-pushed the testifier/require-error branch 2 times, most recently from f5261ba to 24f8663 Compare October 8, 2024 18:15
@mmorel-35 mmorel-35 changed the title fix: use require.NoError instead of t.Fatal(err) fix: use require.NoError instead of t.Fatal(err) in client package Oct 8, 2024
@mmorel-35 mmorel-35 force-pushed the testifier/require-error branch 3 times, most recently from f5fb576 to 92f00e7 Compare October 8, 2024 18:29
@mmorel-35 mmorel-35 marked this pull request as ready for review October 8, 2024 18:32
@ivanvc
Copy link
Member

ivanvc commented Oct 8, 2024

/ok-to-test

@ivanvc
Copy link
Member

ivanvc commented Oct 9, 2024

This looks good. Thanks for your pull request, @mmorel-35. Two files have changes that are not related to require.NoError():

  1. client/v3/ctx_test.go
  2. client/pkg/tlsutil/cipher_suites_test.go

I just wanted to point it out. It could be a minor nitpick, but if others think it's ok to include them in this PR, then this PR LGTM.

Thanks.

@mmorel-35 mmorel-35 force-pushed the testifier/require-error branch 2 times, most recently from 164508f to 3a57f76 Compare October 9, 2024 05:48
@mmorel-35 mmorel-35 force-pushed the testifier/require-error branch 3 times, most recently from c6bf6d1 to fba10cc Compare October 9, 2024 06:05
@ahrtr
Copy link
Member

ahrtr commented Oct 9, 2024

/test pull-etcd-integration-1-cpu-arm64

Copy link
Member

@ahrtr ahrtr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Thanks

Copy link
Member

@ivanvc ivanvc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thanks, Matthieu!

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ahrtr, ivanvc, mmorel-35

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ahrtr ahrtr merged commit 5e238a0 into etcd-io:main Oct 10, 2024
38 checks passed
@mmorel-35 mmorel-35 deleted the testifier/require-error branch October 10, 2024 09:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants