Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Investigate whether resourcePlugin is really needed #226

Open
luxaritas opened this issue Jul 28, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Investigate whether resourcePlugin is really needed #226

luxaritas opened this issue Jul 28, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
priority: p4/minor There is a reasonable workaround, or there is a nice to have with limited impact scope: vite-utils size: sm type: ergonomics Tooling, refactoring, etc

Comments

@luxaritas
Copy link
Member

We should check whether we can get this behavior via existing Vite behavior, namely build.ssrEmitAssets vitejs/vite#13808
@luxaritas luxaritas added type: ergonomics Tooling, refactoring, etc scope: vite-utils size: sm priority: p4/minor There is a reasonable workaround, or there is a nice to have with limited impact labels Jul 28, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
priority: p4/minor There is a reasonable workaround, or there is a nice to have with limited impact scope: vite-utils size: sm type: ergonomics Tooling, refactoring, etc
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@luxaritas