Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consensus-layer Call 145 #1185

Closed
ralexstokes opened this issue Oct 18, 2024 · 5 comments
Closed

Consensus-layer Call 145 #1185

ralexstokes opened this issue Oct 18, 2024 · 5 comments

Comments

@ralexstokes
Copy link
Member

ralexstokes commented Oct 18, 2024

Consensus-layer Call 145

prev: call 144

Meeting Date/Time: Thursday 2024/10/31 at 14:00 UTC
Meeting Duration: 1.5 hours
stream

  1. Electra
  2. PeerDAS / Blob scaling
    • Any updates on peerdas devnets?
    • Rebase PeerDAS onto Electra in the specs?
  3. Research, spec, etc.
  4. Open discussion/Closing remarks
    • Reminder: ACDC on 14 Nov is canceled due to Devcon
@abcoathup
Copy link

🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃🎃
Halloween edition. Hope to see costumes on the call (for those who celebrate).

@nerolation
Copy link

I want to quickly talk about a potential change to the blob base fee calculation we might want to add to EIP-7742 to make sure the base fee changes are (more) symmetric around the target.
This allows us to e.g. go to a target of 4 and a max of 6 blobs without ending up with a base fee that reacts more elastic in one way (down) than the other (up).

Preferably, we would ship it before actually deviating form max = target * 2.

More details in this post:
https://hackmd.io/@Nerolation/HJSGsd1Wkl

@lucassaldanha
Copy link
Contributor

Keen to get feedback on this proposal: ethereum/EIPs#9005

Nothing urgent, just wanted to put it out there. Likely to be a future thing.

@hwwhww
Copy link
Collaborator

hwwhww commented Oct 31, 2024

For PeerDAS, we want to check with EL clients: Is it okay to move PeerDAS feature into the new Fulu spec as a new fork?
The PR is ethereum/consensus-specs#3994

@akashkshirsagar31
Copy link

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants