Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

v3 3.1.17 install does not appear to work with a custom manager folder name #2030

Open
nick0 opened this issue Nov 9, 2021 · 1 comment
Open
Milestone

Comments

@nick0
Copy link

nick0 commented Nov 9, 2021

(edit: I misread the version as 3.1.17 instead of 3.1.7)

Hello,

Does Evo 3 install work with a custom manager folder name?

I have an Evo 3.1.7 site with a custom name for the manager folder. Both the backend manager and front end web site is working fine with a custom manager name. This is achieved per advice in a different GitHub post by:

A config.php file in the root folder with content...
<?php
return [
    'core' => __DIR__ . '/core',
    'manager' => __DIR__ . '/my-custom-mgr-folder',
    'root' => __DIR__
];

and...

A define.php file in the core > custom folder with content...
<?php
define('MGR_DIR', 'my-custom-mgr-folder');

and...

renaming the manager folder in the root (eg to my-custom-mgr-folder)

If I try to manually run the Evo 3.1.7 install (by loading the install folder into the root directory and visiting my-domain.com/install/), the install page returns either a page that just says "MGR_DIR is not defined" or at other times a blank white page. Is this is a bug?

If I revert the folder name to manager and edit those two files to simply point to manager, the 3.1.7 install works as expected.

It would be nice if this was tweaked so install can work in Evo 3 with a custom manager folder without having to revert back to plain old manager each time.

I guess this raises a few question with it too...

  • Is it still a good idea for security in Evo 3 to rename the manager folder?
  • What about the core folder and if so how to achieve?

Many thanks.

@sashabeep
Copy link

sashabeep commented Feb 18, 2022

No, v3.x does not support custom themes from first versions

@Seiger Seiger added this to the 3.2.x milestone Sep 28, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants