You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
yeah, definite bad naming, it's a side effect of these functions being
thrown in to address an old version of LOVE taking sideways matrices in,
which made things really confusing.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 2:22 PM leonardus ***@***.***> wrote:
CPML documentation states that cpml matrices are column-major.
local testmatrix = cpml.mat4.new{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16}
This should be the matrix:
[1 5 9 13]
[2 6 10 14]
[3 7 11 15]
[4 8 12 16]
If so, this prints the opposite results from what is expected:
for _, row in pairs(cpml.mat4.to_vec4s(testmatrix)) do
print("row: ", row[1], row[2], row[3], row[4])endfor _, col in pairs(cpml.mat4.to_vec4s_cols(testmatrix)) do
print("col: ", col[1], col[2], col[3], col[4])end
row: 1 2 3 4
row: 5 6 7 8
row: 9 10 11 12
row: 13 14 15 16
col: 1 5 9 13
col: 2 6 10 14
col: 3 7 11 15
col: 4 8 12 16
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#84>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABVS5W6HKD5AYGBWH5ZVTDWSB73XANCNFSM6AAAAAATZYCBYA>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
CPML documentation states that cpml matrices are column-major.
This should be the matrix:
If so, this prints the opposite results from what is expected:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: