Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Not an issue, just a discussion: I think a disjoint set is a great fit for a conflict resolving logic #253

Open
eugene-eko2000 opened this issue Nov 25, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@eugene-eko2000
Copy link

pub fn run_conflict_task(&mut self, task: ConflictTask) -> Result<ResolutionResult> {

Hi, I'm Evgeny Koshelev, working on STXN now. I'm subscribed on the MEV Letter, interested in understanding the FlashBots MEV approach, as we're working on MEV timing in STXN. This article raised my interest. https://writings.flashbots.net/parallel-builder

I took a look at the parallel execution code, specifically into the conflict finder and grouping code. My first thought there was that this kind of problem is a great fit for a disjoint set. The set is to be built with UnionFind algorithm, also it can support continuous build, keeping a disjoint set and adding new orders continuously.

What do you think about that? If you think it's better to be posted on any FlashBots forum, please let me know.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant