You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Managing feature flags would be challenging when different use cases require some form of distinction:
release flags
permanent flags
experimental flags
etc.
On the Flags overview, it is currently not possible to visually group or organize these different use cases.
Ideal Solution
Ideally, there should be a functionality to further organize feature flags within a namespace, via e.g. groups or tags. Preferable from my end would be tags because I could then tag lifecycle stage (qa, live, sunset, obsolete, etc.)
Search
I searched for other open and closed issues before opening this
Additional Context
Current workaround
The current workaround would be to prefix feature flag keys with some identifiers, e.g. tmp-.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Problem
Managing feature flags would be challenging when different use cases require some form of distinction:
On the Flags overview, it is currently not possible to visually group or organize these different use cases.
Ideal Solution
Ideally, there should be a functionality to further organize feature flags within a namespace, via e.g. groups or tags. Preferable from my end would be tags because I could then tag lifecycle stage (qa, live, sunset, obsolete, etc.)
Search
Additional Context
Current workaround
The current workaround would be to prefix feature flag keys with some identifiers, e.g.
tmp-
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: