-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Copy pathflr.bib
9160 lines (8958 loc) · 512 KB
/
flr.bib
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
@article{stich2025dia,
title={dia: An R package for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration dam impact analysis},
author={Stich, Daniel S and Nieland, Julie L and Sheehan, Timothy F},
journal={Journal of Open Source Software},
volume={10},
number={105},
pages={7475},
year={2025}
}
@article{albertsen2024rebuilding,
title={Rebuilding and Reference Points Under Compensatory and Depensatory Recruitment: A Meta-Analysis of Northeast Atlantic Fish Stocks},
author={Albertsen, Christoffer Moesgaard and Per{\"a}l{\"a}, Tommi and Cardinale, Massimiliano and Winker, Henning and Trijoulet, Vanessa},
journal={Fish and Fisheries},
year={2024},
publisher={Wiley Online Library}
}
@article{couve2024systematic,
title={Systematic Review of Multi-Species Models in Fisheries: Key Features and Current Trends},
author={Couve, Pablo and Bahamon, Nixon and Canales, Cristian M and Company, Joan B},
journal={Fishes},
volume={9},
number={10},
pages={372},
year={2024},
publisher={MDPI}
}
@inproceedings{randelhoff2024symbioses,
title={SYMBIOSES: A Modular Framework to Assess Oil Spill Impacts on Commercial Fish Stocks},
author={Randelhoff, Achim and Bockwoldt, Mathias and Froysa, Havard G and Howell, Daniel and Nepstad, Raymond and Broch, Ole Jacob and Carroll, JoLynn and Refseth, Gro Harlaug and Vikebo, Frode B and Skeie, Geir Morten},
booktitle={International Oil Spill Conference Proceedings},
volume={2024},
number={1},
year={2024},
organization={Allen Press}
}
@article{correa2024standardized,
title={Standardized catch per unit effort of yellowfin tuna in the Atlantic Ocean for the European purse seine fleet operating on floating objects},
author={Correa, GM and Kaplan, DM and Grande, M and Uranga, J},
journal={Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT},
volume={81},
number={2},
pages={1--26},
year={2024}
}
@article{kell2024,
title={Developing management plans for sprat (Sprattus sprattus) in the Celtic Sea consistent with an Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries},
author={Kell, Laurence T and Bentley, Jacob and Feary, David and Egan, Afra and Nolan, Cormac},
journal={Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences},
number={ja},
year={2024}
}
@article{BROOKS2024106896,
title = {Pragmatic approaches to modeling recruitment in fisheries stock assessment: A perspective},
journal = {Fisheries Research},
volume = {270},
pages = {106896},
year = {2024},
issn = {0165-7836},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2023.106896},
url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165783623002898},
author = {Elizabeth N. Brooks},
keywords = {Stock recruit relationships, Fecundity unit, Age at recruitment, Steepness, Recruitment diagnostics},
}
@article{GONZALEZTRONCOSO2024119452,
title = {Equilibrium, transient dynamics and sustainable reference points under age-specific natural mortality rates and varying levels of population productivity: The case of the Northern cod stock},
journal = {Journal of Environmental Management},
volume = {349},
pages = {119452},
year = {2024},
issn = {0301-4797},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119452},
url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479723022405},
author = {Diana González-Troncoso and José M. Maroto and M. Eugenia Mera and Manuel Morán},
keywords = {Age-specific natural mortality, Age-structured models, Equilibrium, Fisheries management and conservation, Marine fisheries, Northern cod stock collapse, Transient dynamics},
}
@article{COPE2024106859,
title = {The good practices of practicable alchemy in the stock assessment continuum: Fundamentals and principles of analytical methods to support science-based fisheries management under data and resource limitations},
journal = {Fisheries Research},
volume = {270},
pages = {106859},
year = {2024},
issn = {0165-7836},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2023.106859},
url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165783623002527},
author = {Jason M. Cope},
keywords = {Stock assessment, Data-limited, Life history, Uncertainty, Risk analysis, Simulation testing},
}
@article{armelloni2023workshop,
title={Workshop to scope and preselect indicators for criterion D3C3 under MSFD decision (EU) 2017/848 (WKD3C3SCOPE)},
author={Armelloni, Enrico and Bolund, Elisabeth and Canal, Gema and Cardinale, Massimiliano and Coscia, Ilaria and Croll, Jasper and Balic, Daria Ezgeta and Falsone, Fabio and Fortibuoni, Tomaso and Galatchi, Madalina and others},
journal={ICES. Scientific Reports},
year={2023},
publisher={ICES}
}
@article{rice2023comparison,
title={COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS OF SOUTH ATLANTIC CPUE 2023 ICCAT BLUE SHARK ASSESSMENT},
author={Rice, Joel},
journal={Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT},
volume={80},
number={4},
pages={337--344},
year={2023}
}
@article{tiddassessing,
title={Assessing the response of Indian Ocean yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) stock to variations in DFAD fishing effort},
year={2023},
author={Tidd, Alex and Capello, Manuela and Guillotreau, Patrice and Fu, Dan}
}
@article{griffiths2023including,
title={Including older fish in fisheries management: A new age-based indicator and reference point for exploited fish stocks},
author={Griffiths, Christopher A and Winker, Henning and Bartolino, Valerio and Wennhage, H{\aa}kan and Orio, Alessandro and Cardinale, Massimiliano},
journal={Fish and Fisheries},
year={2023},
publisher={Wiley Online Library}
}
@article{mourato2023assessment,
title={Assessment of the eastern Atlantic sailfish stock using JABBA model},
author={Mourato, B and Sant’Ana, R and Kikuchi, E and Cardoso, L Gustavo and Ngom, F and Arocha, F and Kimoto, A and Ortiz, M},
journal={Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT},
volume={80},
number={8},
pages={315--336},
year={2023}
}
@article{URIARTE2023105512,
title = {Lessons learnt on the management of short-lived fish from the Bay of Biscay anchovy case study: Satisfying fishery needs and sustainability under recruitment uncertainty},
journal = {Marine Policy},
volume = {150},
pages = {105512},
year = {2023},
issn = {0308-597X},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2023.105512},
url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X23000398},
author = {Andrés Uriarte and Leire Ibaibarriaga and Sonia Sánchez-Maroño and Pablo Abaunza and Marga Andrés and Erwan Duhamel and Ernesto Jardim and Lionel Pawlowski and Raúl Prellezo and Beatriz A. Roel},
keywords = {Fishery management, Participatory management, Harvest control rule, Recruitment index, Small pelagic fish, Anchovy},
abstract = {This paper summarizes the lessons learnt for the management of small pelagic fish from the case study of managing the international fishery on the Bay of Biscay anchovy. A constant catch regime ended up with a fishery crash and closure (2005–2009) after a series of recruitment failures. Precautionary advices had been disregarded due to their inability to predict the size of the population during the first half of the year when the major fishery takes place. The crash triggered the EU to develop a long-term management plan in 2008. In the absence of a recruitment indicator, biological risk was minimized through a close coupling between assessment, advice and management, changing the management year to start just after the spring surveys on adults. A major improvement arrived in 2014 by the incorporation of an early recruitment indicator from an autumn acoustic survey on juveniles. This allowed additional exploitation of the resource at similar risk levels. Accordingly, TACs are nowadays set after the recruit survey on a management calendar basis. The interactive collaboration between fishers, scientists, and managers allowed inclusion of the stakeholders’ preferences for a biomass-based catch bounded harvest strategy suitable for these valuable fisheries. This strategy allows catches between a minimum and maximum TAC level, to account for an economically viable minimum activity when approaching a minimum biomass threshold level, and for the limited market absorption capacity when exceeding an upper biomass threshold level, respectively. Such strategy was adopted by consensus and supposed a successful participatory process in fishery management.}
}
@article{https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12721,
author = {Dowling, Natalie A. and Wilson, Jono R. and Cope, Jason M. and Dougherty, Dawn T. and Lomonico, Serena and Revenga, Carmen and Snouffer, Brian J. and Salinas, Natalio Godoy and Torres-Cañete, Felipe and Chick, Rowan C. and Fowler, Ashley M. and Parma, Ana M.},
title = {The FishPath approach for fisheries management in a data- and capacity-limited world},
journal = {Fish and Fisheries},
volume = {n/a},
number = {n/a},
pages = {},
keywords = {data limited, decision-support, fisheries management, harvest strategies, management strategies, sustainability},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12721},
url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/faf.12721},
eprint = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/faf.12721},
abstract = {Abstract Successful fisheries management systems tend to be underpinned by harvest strategies, specifying formally agreed data collection systems, assessment approaches and management measures used to regulate fishing pressure. While harvest strategies can be effective even in data- and capacity-limited (DCL) situations, their development remains challenging in such contexts. We present a process and decision-support tool, FishPath, to guide the identification of suitable harvest strategy component options given often debilitating conditions: (i) resource limitations and lack of technical management capacity; (ii) ‘uniqueness’ of DCL fisheries; (iii) the concept of harvest strategies is unfamiliar to managers and scientists, and the universe of options is hard to navigate; and (iv) the lack of an effective participatory process to identify solutions tailored to local contexts. These conditions can lead to either management paralysis or generic solutions that may be poor fits to specific conditions. The FishPath Tool uses a diagnostic questionnaire that elicits the key characteristics and specific circumstances of a fishery. It compares these with the requirements of alternative options from an inventory of possible harvest strategy components, identifies where these requirements are met and provides customised, transparent guidance on the appropriateness of component options of a harvest strategy, specific to the fishery of interest and its governance context. The FishPath Process is a facilitated multi-stakeholder, participatory engagement process aimed to set fisheries on the path to develop a harvest strategy. The FishPath Process and Tool combine to ensure a bottom-up, documented, transparent, replicable and efficient process.}
}
@article{cousido2022surplus,
title={Surplus production models: a practical review of recent approaches},
author={Cousido-Rocha, Marta and Pennino, Maria Grazia and Izquierdo, Francisco and Paz, Anxo and Lojo, Davinia and Tifoura, Amina and Zanni, Mohamed Yosri and Cervi{\~n}o, Santiago},
journal={Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries},
pages={1--18},
year={2022},
publisher={Springer}
}
@article{doi:10.1139/cjfas-2021-0213,
author = {Batts, Luke and Minto, Cóilín and Gerritsen, Hans and Brophy, Deirdre},
title = {Numbers or mass? Comparison of two theoretically different stage-based stock assessment models and their ability to model simulated and real-life stocks},
journal = {Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences},
volume = {79},
number = {10},
pages = {1605-1624},
year = {2022},
doi = {10.1139/cjfas-2021-0213},
URL = {https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2021-0213},
eprint = {https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2021-0213},
abstract = { Stage-based assessment models are a type of fisheries stock assessment model that offer an alternative middle ground between aggregate and compositional models. We compare the capabilities of two theoretically different stage-based assessment approaches: an implementation of a biomass-based delay-difference model first described in a theoretical paper by Schnute in 1987, and an implementation of the well-known numbers-based two-stage model Catch-Survey Analysis (CSA). Models were tested within a simulation framework as well as on the real stock of white-bellied anglerfish (Lophius piscatorius) in the Celtic Seas and Northern Bay of Biscay. For the simulated stocks, estimates from the biomass-based two-stage models were close to the true values in certain scenarios, but were sensitive to selectivity assumptions and configuration of growth within the model. CSA was more robust to selectivity assumptions, performing well in all simulated stock scenarios. Overall, results indicated that CSA was a robust stock assessment model but with relatively low precision, whereas the Schnute model was precise but required growth and mean fish weight data unaffected by selectivity. }
}
@article{bach2022,
title={Intervene or wait? A model evaluating the timing of intervention in conservation conflicts adaptive management under uncertainty},
author={Bach, Adrian and Minderman, Jeroen and Bunnefeld, Nils and Mill, Aileen and Duthie, Alexander},
journal={Ecology and Society},
volume={27},
number={3},
year={2022},
abstract = {The timing of biodiversity managers’ interventions can be critical to the success of conservation, especially in situations of conflict between conservation objectives and human livelihood, i.e., conservation conflicts. Given the uncertainty associated with complex social-ecological systems and the potentially irreversible consequences of delayed action for biodiversity and livelihoods, managers tend to simply intervene as soon as possible by precaution. However, refraining from intervening when the situation allows can be beneficial, notably by saving critical management resources. We introduce a strategy for managers to decide, based on monitoring, whether intervention is required or if waiting is possible. This study evaluates the performance of this waiting strategy compared to a strategy of unconditional intervention at every opportunity. We built an individual-based model of conservation conflict between a manager aiming to conserve an animal population and farmers aiming to maximize yield by protecting their crop from wildlife damage. We then simulated a budget-constrained adaptive management over time applying each strategy, while accounting for uncertainty around population dynamics and around decision making of managers and farmers. Our results showed that when the decision for the manager to intervene was based on a prediction of population trajectory, the waiting strategy performed at least as well as unconditional intervention while also allowing managers to save resources by avoiding unnecessary interventions. Under difficult budgetary constraints on managers, this waiting strategy ensured as high yields as unconditional intervention while significantly improving conservation outcomes by compensating managers’ lack of resources with the benefits accrued over waiting periods. This suggests that waiting strategies are worth considering in conservation conflicts because they can facilitate equitable management with a more efficient use of management resources, which are often limiting in biodiversity conservation.},
doi={10.5751/ES-13341-270303},
publisher={The Resilience Alliance}
}
@article{10.1371/journal.pone.0269543,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0269543},
author = {Scott, Finlay AND Yao, Nan AND Scott, Robert Dryden},
journal = {PLOS ONE},
publisher = {Public Library of Science},
title = {AMPLE: An R package for capacity building on fisheries harvest strategies},
year = {2022},
month = {06},
volume = {17},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269543},
pages = {1-14},
abstract = {Fisheries harvest strategies are formal frameworks that represent a best-practice approach for sustainable fisheries management. A key component of a harvest strategy is a ’pre-agreed rule’, known as a harvest control rule (HCR), that sets fishing opportunities, e.g. catch limits, based on an estimate of fish stock status, e.g. estimated stock biomass. The harvest strategy development process is driven by stakeholders who are required to make a range of informed decisions, including on the selection of the preferred HCR. Capacity building may be required to facilitate the stakeholder engagement, particularly regarding the technical components of harvest strategies, including HCRs. The AMPLE package for R provides three interactive apps that support capacity building and stakeholder engagement on HCRs. These apps have been used during in-country national workshops around the western and central Pacific Ocean (WCPO) to support the development of harvest strategies for the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission. These apps include several novel features: they take users from a gentle introduction to how HCRs work, to using methods for testing, comparing and selecting a preferred HCR from a suite of candidates. They include an introduction to the impact of uncertainty on the performance of an HCR, introduce performance indicators and discuss methods for selecting the preferred HCR based on management objectives. As such they provide a more detailed overview of HCRs than currently existing alternatives. These apps provide an effective platform for hands-on learning and have proven to be successful at supporting capacity building on HCRs in the WCPO. For example, using them for group activities and competitions stimulated productive discussions and increased understanding. As the model fishery in AMPLE is generic and not based on a real example, the apps will also be of interest to scientists, managers and stakeholders developing harvest strategies in other regions.},
number = {6},
}
@article{10.1093/icesjms/fsac043,
author = {Kell, Laurence T and Minto, Cóilín and Gerritsen, Hans D},
title = "{Evaluation of the skill of length-based indicators to identify stock status and trends}",
journal = {ICES Journal of Marine Science},
year = {2022},
month = {03},
issn = {1054-3139},
doi = {10.1093/icesjms/fsac043},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsac043},
note = {fsac043},
eprint = {https://academic.oup.com/icesjms/advance-article-pdf/doi/10.1093/icesjms/fsac043/43058181/fsac043.pdf},
}
@article{magnussonfisheries,
title={Fisheries data management at GFCM Review and recommendations},
author={Magnusson, Arni},
year={2022}
}
@article{winker2022consistency,
title={Consistency and Robustness testing of candidate reference point systems for North East Atlantic stocks},
author={Winker, Henning and Cardinale, Massimiliano and Mosqueira, Iago and Kell, Laurance and Konrad, Christoph and Gras, Michael and Sharma, Rishi and Lordan, Colm},
year={2022}
}
@article{https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12637,
author = {Ovando, Daniel and Free, Christopher M. and Jensen, Olaf P. and Hilborn, Ray},
title = {A history and evaluation of catch-only stock assessment models},
journal = {Fish and Fisheries},
volume = {23},
number = {3},
pages = {616-630},
keywords = {catch-only models, data-limited assessment, global fisheries, stock assessment, stock reduction analysis},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12637},
url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/faf.12637},
eprint = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/faf.12637},
year = {2022}
}
@article{andmauricio2021standardized,
author={Ortiz de Zarate, V and Ortiz, M},
title={Standardized Catch Per Unit Of Effort Of Albacore (Thunnus alalunga) In The Northeast Atlantic From The Spanish Bait Boat Fleet For Period: 1981-2019},
journal={Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT},
volume={78},
number={8},
pages={117-127},
year={2021}
doi = {},
url = {https://www.iccat.int/Documents/CVSP/CV078_2021/n_8/CV078080117.pdf},
}
@article{10.1134/S0032945221050155,
author = {Turan, C and Ergenler, A and Doğdu, SA and Turan F},
title = {Age and Growth of Red Sea Goatfish, Parupeneus forsskali from Iskenderun Bay, Northeastern Mediterranean Sea},
journal = {Journal of Ichthyology},
volume = {61},
pages={758-763},
year = {2021},
doi = {10.1093/icesjms/fsab169},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1134/S0032945221050155},
}
@article{10.1093/icesjms/fsab169,
author = {Fischer, Simon H and De Oliveira, José A A and Mumford, John D and Kell, Laurence T},
title = "{Application of explicit precautionary principles in data-limited fisheries management}",
journal = {ICES Journal of Marine Science},
year = {2021},
month = {09},
issn = {1054-3139},
doi = {10.1093/icesjms/fsab169},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsab169},
note = {fsab169},
eprint = {https://academic.oup.com/icesjms/advance-article-pdf/doi/10.1093/icesjms/fsab169/40307158/fsab169.pdf},
}
@article{MAYNOU2021105853,
title = {Bioeconomic impacts of two simple modifications to trawl nets in the NW Mediterranean},
journal = {Ocean \& Coastal Management},
volume = {213},
pages = {105853},
year = {2021},
issn = {0964-5691},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105853},
url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569121003367},
author = {Francesc Maynou and Alfredo García-de-Vinuesa and Pilar Sánchez and Montserrat Demestre},
keywords = {Bottom trawl, T90 panel, Selective grid, Bioeconomic model, Mediterranean fisheries}
}
@article{10.1093/icesjms/fsab151,
author = {Azevedo, Manuela and Silva, Cristina and Vølstad, Jon Helge},
title = "{Onshore biological sampling of landings by species and size category within auction sites can be more efficient than trip-based concurrent sampling}",
journal = {ICES Journal of Marine Science},
year = {2021},
month = {08},
issn = {1054-3139},
doi = {10.1093/icesjms/fsab151},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsab151},
note = {fsab151},
eprint = {https://academic.oup.com/icesjms/advance-article-pdf/doi/10.1093/icesjms/fsab151/39728851/fsab151.pdf},
}
@article{10.3389/fmars.2021.624355,
author={Kaplan, Isaac C. and Gaichas, Sarah K. and Stawitz, Christine C. and Lynch, Patrick D. and Marshall, Kristin N. and Deroba, Jonathan J. and Masi, Michelle and Brodziak, Jon K. T. and Aydin, Kerim Y. and Holsman, Kirstin and Townsend, Howard and Tommasi, Desiree and Smith, James A. and Koenigstein, Stefan and Weijerman, Mariska and Link, Jason},
title={Management Strategy Evaluation: Allowing the Light on the Hill to Illuminate More Than One Species},
journaL={Frontiers in Marine Science},
volume={8},
pages={688},
year={2021},
url={https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmars.2021.624355},
doi={10.3389/fmars.2021.624355},
issn={2296-7745}
}
@article{https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.10438,
author = {Sun, Ming and Li, Yunzhou and Zhang, Chongliang and Xu, Binduo and Ren, Yiping and Chen, Yong},
title = {Management of Data-Limited Fisheries: Identifying Informative Data to Achieve Sustainable Fisheries},
journal = {North American Journal of Fisheries Management},
volume = {40},
number = {3},
pages = {733-751},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.10438},
url = {https://afspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/nafm.10438},
eprint = {https://afspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/nafm.10438},
year = {2020}
}
@article{doi:10.1080/23308249.2021.1884642,
author = {H. A. Perryman and C. Hansen and D. Howell and E. Olsen},
title = {A Review of Applications Evaluating Fisheries Management Scenarios through Marine Ecosystem Models},
journal = {Reviews in Fisheries Science \& Aquaculture},
volume = {0},
number = {0},
pages = {1-36},
year = {2021},
publisher = {Taylor & Francis},
doi = {10.1080/23308249.2021.1884642},
URL = {https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2021.1884642},
eprint = { https://doi.org/10.1080/23308249.2021.1884642}
}
@article{10.1093/icesjms/fsab018,
author = {Fischer, Simon H and De Oliveira, José A A and Mumford, John D and Kell, Laurence T},
title = "{Using a genetic algorithm to optimize a data-limited catch rule}",
journal = {ICES Journal of Marine Science},
year = {2021},
month = {03},
abstract = "{Many data-limited fish stocks worldwide require management advice. Simple empirical management procedures have been used to manage data-limited fisheries but do not necessarily ensure compliance with maximum sustainable yield objectives and precautionary principles. Genetic algorithms are efficient optimization procedures for which the objectives are formalized as a fitness function. This optimization can be included when testing management procedures in a management strategy evaluation. This study explored the application of a genetic algorithm to an empirical catch rule and found that this approach could substantially improve the performance of the catch rule. The optimized parameterization and the magnitude of the improvement were dependent on the specific stock, stock status, and definition of the fitness function. The genetic algorithm proved to be an efficient and automated method for tuning the catch rule and removed the need for manual intervention during the optimization process. Therefore, we conclude that the approach could also be applied to other management procedures, case-specific tuning, and even data-rich stocks. Finally, we recommend the phasing out of the current generic ICES “2 over 3” advice rule in favour of case-specific catch rules of the form tested here, although we caution that neither works well for fast-growing stocks.}",
issn = {1054-3139},
doi = {10.1093/icesjms/fsab018},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsab018},
note = {fsab018},
eprint = {https://academic.oup.com/icesjms/advance-article-pdf/doi/10.1093/icesjms/fsab018/36507871/fsab018.pdf},
}
@article{spratblacksea,
author = {Пятинский Михаил and МихайловичШляхов Владислав and АлексеевичШляхова Ольга Васильевна},
title = {ДИНАМИКА ЗАПАСОВ ШПРОТА В ЧЕРНОМ МОРЕ И ПЕРСПЕКТИВЫ ЕГО ОСВОЕНИЯ},
journal = {Вопросы рыболовства},
volume = {21},
number = {4},
publisher = {Азово-Черноморский филиал Всероссийского научно-исследовательского института рыбного хозяйства и океанографии (АзНИИРХ)},
pages = {396-410},
year = {2020},
doi = {10.36038 / 0234-2774-2020-21-4-396-410},
URL = {https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/dinamika-zapasov-shprota-v-chernom-more-i-perspektivy-ego-osvoeniya}
}
@article{10.2983/035.039.0310,
author = {Kathleen M. Hemeon and Kathy A. Ashton-Alcox and Eric N. Powell and Sara M. Pace and Leanne M. Poussard and Laura K. Solinger and Thomas M. Soniat},
title = {{Novel Shell Stock–Recruitment Models for Crassostrea virginica as a Function of Regional Shell Effective Surface Area, A Missing Link for Sustainable Management}},
volume = {39},
journal = {Journal of Shellfish Research},
number = {3},
publisher = {National Shellfisheries Association},
pages = {633 -- 654},
keywords = {Crassostrea virginica, Delaware Bay, salinity, shell surface area, stock–recruitment relationship, substrate preference},
year = {2020},
doi = {10.2983/035.039.0310},
URL = {https://doi.org/10.2983/035.039.0310}
}
@article{
author={Mannini,Alessandro and Pinto,Cecilia and Konrad,Christoph and Vasilakopoulos,Paraskevas and Winker,Henning},
year={2020},
month={Dec 15},
title={“The Elephant in the Room”: Exploring Natural Mortality Uncertainty in Statistical Catch at Age Models},
journal={Frontiers in Marine Science},
note={Copyright - © 2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License; Last updated - 2020-12-16; SubjectsTermNotLitGenreText - Mediterranean Sea; Norway},
abstract={The natural mortality rate (M) of a fish stock is typically highly influential on the outcome of age-structured stock assessment models, but at the same time extremely difficult to estimate. In data-limited stock assessments, M usually relies on a range of empirically or theoretically derived M estimates, which can vary vastly. This paper aims at evaluating the impact of this variability in M using seven Mediterranean stocks as case studies of statistical catch-at-age assessments for information-limited fisheries. The two main bodies carrying out stock assessments in the Mediterranean and Black Seas are European Union’s Scientific Technical Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF) and Food and Agriculture Organization’s General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (GFCM). Current advices in terms of fishing mortality levels is based on a single ‘best’ M assumption which is agreed by stock assessment expert working groups, but uncertainty about M is not taken into consideration. Our results demonstrate that not accounting for the uncertainty surrounding M during the assessment process can lead to strong underestimation or overestimation of fishing mortality, potentially biasing the management process. We recommend carrying out relevant sensitivity analyses to improve stock assessment and fisheries management in data-limited areas such as the Mediterranean basin.},
language={English},
url={https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.library.wur.nl/scholarly-journals/elephant-room-exploring-natural-mortality/docview/2470128813/se-2?accountid=27871},
}
@article{winker2020jabba,
title={JABBA-Select: Incorporating life history and fisheries’ selectivity into surplus production models},
author={Winker, Henning and Carvalho, Felipe and Thorson, James T and Kell, Laurance T and Parker, Denham and Kapur, Maia and Sharma, Rishi and Booth, Anthony J and Kerwath, Sven E},
journal={Fisheries Research},
volume={222},
pages={105355},
year={2020},
publisher={Elsevier}
}
@article{chang2020evaluation,
title={Evaluation of the status and risk of overexploitation of the Pacific billfish stocks considering non-stationary population processes},
author={Chang, Yi-Jay and Winker, Henning and Sculley, Michelle and Hsu, Jhen},
journal={Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography},
volume={175},
pages={104707},
year={2020},
publisher={Elsevier}
}
@article{garcia2020multi,
title={A multi-stock harvest control rule based on “pretty good yield” ranges to support mixed-fisheries management},
author={Garcia, Dorleta and Dolder, Paul J and Iriondo, Ane and Moore, Claire and Prellezo, Ra{\'u}l and Urtizberea, Agurtzane},
journal={ICES Journal of Marine Science},
volume={77},
number={1},
pages={119--135},
year={2020},
publisher={Oxford University Press}
}
@article{free2020blood,
title={Blood from a stone: Performance of catch-only methods in estimating stock biomass status},
author={Free, Christopher M and Jensen, Olaf P and Anderson, Sean C and Gutierrez, Nicolas L and Kleisner, Kristin M and Longo, Catherine and Minto, C{\'o}il{\'\i}n and Osio, Giacomo Chato and Walsh, Jessica C},
journal={Fisheries Research},
volume={223},
pages={105452},
year={2020},
publisher={Elsevier}
}
@article{vasilakopoulos2020selectivity,
title={Selectivity metrics for fisheries management and advice},
author={Vasilakopoulos, Paraskevas and Jardim, Ernesto and Konrad, Christoph and Rihan, Dominic and Mannini, Alessandro and Pinto, Cecilia and Casey, John and Mosqueira, Iago and O’Neill, Finbarr G},
journal={Fish and Fisheries},
volume={21},
number={3},
pages={621--638},
year={2020},
publisher={Wiley Online Library}
}
@article{winker2020development,
title={DEVELOPMENT OF BAYESIAN STATE-SPACE SURPLUS PRODUCTION MODEL JABBA FOR ASSESSING THE MEDITERRANEAN SWORDFISH (XIPHIAS GLADIUS) STOCK},
author={Winker, Henning and Kimoto, Ai and Mourato, Bruno L and Ortiz, George Tserpes4 Mauricio},
journal={Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT},
volume={77},
number={3},
pages={508--536},
year={2020}
}
@article{merino2020characterization,
title={Characterization, Communication, and Management of Uncertainty in Tuna Fisheries},
author={Merino, Gorka and Murua, Hilario and Santiago, Josu and Arrizabalaga, Haritz and Restrepo, Victor},
journal={Sustainability},
volume={12},
number={19},
pages={8245},
year={2020},
publisher={Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute}
}
@article{coll2020spelmed,
title={SPELMED, evaluation of the population status and specific management alternatives for the small pelagic fish stocks in the Northwestern Mediterranean Sea},
author={Coll, Marta and Bellido, Jos{\'e} M},
year={2020},
publisher={European Commission}
}
@article{fazli2020stock,
title={Stock enhancement and density-dependence of Caspian kutum (Rutilus kutum Kamensky, 1901) in Iranian waters of the Caspian Sea},
author={Fazli, Hasan and Daryanabard, Gholam Reza},
journal={International Journal of Aquatic Biology},
volume={8},
number={4},
pages={281--287},
year={2020}
}
@article{mantopoulou2020assessment,
title={ASSESSMENT OF THE MEDITERRANEAN SWORDFISH STOCK BY MEANS OF ASSESSMENT FOR ALL},
author={Mantopoulou--Palouka, Danai and Tserpes, George},
journal={Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT},
volume={77},
number={3},
pages={482--507},
year={2020}
}
@article{kell2020validation,
title={VALIDATION OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS FOR DATA LIMITED STOCKS},
author={Kell, Laurence T and Taylor, Nathan and Palma, Carlos},
journal={Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT},
volume={77},
number={4},
pages={157--167},
year={2020}
}
@article{merino2020addressing,
title={ADDRESSING RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE PEER REVIEW AND AMMENDMENTS TO THE NORTH ATLANTIC ALBACORE MSE},
author={Merino, G and Santiago, J and Andonegi, E and Urtizberea, A and Arrizabalaga, H},
journal={Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT},
volume={76},
number={8},
pages={40--50},
year={2020}
}
@article{mourato2020developing,
title={DEVELOPING OF BAYESIAN STATE-SPACE SURPLUS PRODUCTION MODEL JABBA FOR ASSESSING ATLANTIC WHITE MARLIN (Kajikia albida) STOCK},
author={Mourato, BL and Winker, H and Carvalho, F and Kimoto, A and Ortiz, M},
journal={Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT},
volume={76},
number={4},
pages={235--254},
year={2020}
}
@article{10.1093/icesjms/fsaa054,
author = {Fischer, Simon H and De Oliveira, José A A and Kell, Laurence T},
title = "{Linking the performance of a data-limited empirical catch rule to life-history traits}",
journal = {ICES Journal of Marine Science},
year = {2020},
month = {06},
abstract = "{Worldwide, the majorities of fish stocks are data-limited and lack fully quantitative stock assessments. Within ICES, such data-limited stocks are currently managed by setting total allowable catch without the use of target reference points. To ensure that such advice is precautionary, we used management strategy evaluation to evaluate an empirical rule that bases catch advice on recent catches, information from a biomass survey index, catch length frequencies, and MSY reference point proxies. Twenty-nine fish stocks were simulated covering a wide range of life histories. The performance of the rule varied substantially between stocks, and the risk of breaching limit reference points was inversely correlated to the von Bertalanffy growth parameter k. Stocks with k\\>0.32 year−1 had a high probability of stock collapse. A time series cluster analysis revealed four types of dynamics, i.e. groups with similar terminal spawning stock biomass (collapsed, BMSY, 2BMSY, 3BMSY). It was shown that a single generic catch rule cannot be applied across all life histories, and management should instead be linked to life-history traits, and in particular, the nature of the time series of stock metrics. The lessons learnt can help future work to shape scientific research into data-limited fisheries management and to ensure that fisheries are MSY compliant and precautionary.}",
issn = {1054-3139},
doi = {10.1093/icesjms/fsaa054},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsaa054},
note = {fsaa054},
eprint = {https://academic.oup.com/icesjms/advance-article-pdf/doi/10.1093/icesjms/fsaa054/33380381/fsaa054.pdf},
}
@Article{10.1093/icesjms/fsz181,
author = {Garcia, Dorleta and Dolder, Paul J and Iriondo, Ane and Moore, Claire and Prellezo, Raúl and Urtizberea, Agurtzane},
title = "{A multi-stock harvest control rule based on “pretty good yield” ranges to support mixed-fisheries management}",
journal = {ICES Journal of Marine Science},
year = {2019},
month = {10},
abstract = "{Advice for commercially exploited fish stocks is usually given on a stock-by-stock basis. In light of the ecosystem-based fisheries management, the need to move towards a holistic approach has been largely acknowledged. In addition, the discard bans in some countries requires consistent catch advice among stocks to mitigate choke species limiting fisheries activity. In this context, in 2015, the European Commission proposed the use of fishing mortality ranges around fishing mortality targets to give flexibility to the catch advice system and improve the use of fishing opportunities in mixed-fisheries. We present a multi-stock harvest control rule (HCR) that uses single stock assessment results and fishing mortality ranges to generate a consistent catch advice among stocks. We tested the performance of the HCR in two different case studies. An artificial case study with three stocks exploited simultaneously by a single fleet and the demersal mixed-fishery operating in Bay of Biscay and Celtic Sea. The HCR produced consistent catch advice among stocks when there was only a single fleet exploiting them. Even more, the HCR removed the impact of the discard ban. However, in a multi-fleet framework the performance of the HCR varied depending on the characteristics of the fleets.}",
issn = {1054-3139},
doi = {10.1093/icesjms/fsz181},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsz181},
note = {fsz181},
eprint = {http://oup.prod.sis.lan/icesjms/advance-article-pdf/doi/10.1093/icesjms/fsz181/30132108/fsz181.pdf},
}
@Article{S2019,
author={Sanchez, S, Ibaibarriaga, L, Uriarte, A, Prellezo, R, Andres, M, Abaunza, P, Jardim, E, Lehuta, S, Pawlowski, L, Roel, B},
title={Challenges of management strategy evaluation for small pelagic fish: the Bay of Biscay anchovy case study},
journal={Marine Ecology Progress Series},
year={2019},
volume={617-618},
pages={245-263},
doi={10.3354/meps12602},
url={https://www.int-res.com/abstracts/meps/v617-618/p245-263/}
}
@article{KOLODY2019217,
title = "Recruitment in tuna RFMO stock assessment and management: A review of current approaches and challenges",
journal = "Fisheries Research",
volume = "217",
pages = "217 - 234",
year = "2019",
note = "Recruitment: Theory, Estimation, and Application in Fishery Stock Assessment Models",
issn = "0165-7836",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2018.11.031",
url = "http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165783618303412",
author = "Dale S. Kolody and J. Paige Eveson and Ann L. Preece and Campbell R. Davies and Richard M. Hillary",
keywords = "tuna RFMOs, Fisheries recruitment, Management strategy evaluation, Stock assessment"
}
@article{SUN201927,
title = "Developing and evaluating a management strategy evaluation framework for the Gulf of Maine cod (Gadus morhua)",
journal = "Ecological Modelling",
volume = "404",
pages = "27 - 35",
year = "2019",
issn = "0304-3800",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2019.04.007",
url = "http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380019301449",
author = "Ming Sun and Yunzhou Li and Yiping Ren and Yong Chen",
keywords = "Fishery management, Management strategy evaluation, Harvest control rules, Uncertainty"
}
@article{winker2019bayesian,
title={Bayesian state-space surplus production model JABBA assessment of Atlantic bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) stock},
author={Winker, Henning and Kerwath, Sven and Merino, Gorka and Ortiz, Mauricio},
journal={Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT},
volume={75},
number={7},
pages={2129--2168},
year={2019},
url={https://www.iccat.int/Documents/CVSP/CV075_2018/n_7/CV075072129.pdf}
}
@article{thorpe2019multispecies,
title={What is multispecies MSY? A worked example from the North Sea},
author={Thorpe, Robert B},
journal={Journal of Fish Fiology},
year={2019},
doi = {10.1111/jfb.13967}
}
@article{afflerbach2019quantifying,
title={Quantifying uncertainty in the wild-caught fisheries goal of the Ocean Health Index},
author={Afflerbach, Jamie C and Frazier, Melanie and Froehlich, Halley E and Anderson, Sean C and Halpern, Benjamin S},
journal={Fish and Fisheries},
volume={20},
number={2},
pages={343--354},
year={2019},
doi = {10.1111/faf.12346},
url={https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/faf.12346}
}
@article{10.1093/icesjms/fsz015,
author = {De Oliveira, José A A and Thorpe, Robert B},
title = "{Comparing conceptual frameworks for a fish community MSY (FCMSY) using management strategy evaluation—an example from the North Sea}",
year = {2019},
month = {02},
abstract = "{Maximum sustainable yield (MSY) is a well-established concept that is mandated by legislation, and has a clear theoretical meaning in terms of a single stock. However, its definition is problematic in a multispecies setting, which makes it more difficult to apply the MSY principle. In this study of the North Sea fish community, we consider several possible MSY candidates, and evaluate them in terms of their ability to produce optimum long-term yield whilst avoiding unacceptable risk of stock impairment. We perform this evaluation with an ensemble of size-structured models using a management strategy evaluation approach, in which harvest control rules (HCRs) are used to determine levels of fishing as a function of the proposed MSY target and stock status, taking account of recruitment and model parameter uncertainties. We find that HCRs of the type considered here are always useful in the scenarios we tested, as they reduce overfishing risk much more than average long-term yield. This is independent of the precise form of the HCR, so it is more important to implement one rigorously than obsess over the rule details. For a lax definition of overfishing, which accepts relatively severe stock depletion (B \\< 10\\% B0), and using HCRs, risks are “low” across all strategies, and the Nash equilibrium is the best performing MSY approach considered here. For more stringent definitions of “at risk” (e.g. likelihood of B \\< 20\\% of B0), the application of HCRs can allow a range of alternative formulations of MSY. Thus, the definition of MSY may be sensitive to judgements about acceptable levels of risk, and consistent application of a sensible management framework may be more important than developing the best possible theoretical definition of MSY.}",
doi = {10.1093/icesjms/fsz015},
url = {https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsz015},
eprint = {http://oup.prod.sis.lan/icesjms/advance-article-pdf/doi/10.1093/icesjms/fsz015/27958948/fsz015.pdf},
}
@article{sagarese2019lessons,
title={Lessons learned from data-limited evaluations of data-rich reef fish species in the Gulf of Mexico: implications for providing fisheries management advice for data-poor stocks},
author={Sagarese, Skyler R and Harford, William J and Walter, John F and Bryan, Meaghan D and Isely, J Jeffery and Smith, Matthew W and Goethel, Daniel R and Rios, Adyan B and Cass-Calay, Shannon L and Porch, Clay E and others},
journal={Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences},
volume={76},
number={9},
pages={1624--1639},
year={2019},
publisher={NRC Research Press}
}
@article{goethel2019recent,
title={Recent advances in management strategy evaluation: introduction to the special issue “Under pressure: addressing fisheries challenges with Management Strategy Evaluation”},
author={Goethel, Daniel R and Lucey, Sean M and Berger, Aaron M and Gaichas, Sarah K and Karp, Melissa A and Lynch, Patrick D and Walter III, John F},
journal={Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences},
volume={76},
number={10},
pages={1689--1696},
year={2019},
publisher={NRC Research Press}
}
@phdthesis{gamiz2019evaluation,
title={Evaluation and implementation of discards policies under catch-based fisheries management regimes},
author={Gamiz, Nekane Alzorriz},
year={2019},
school={Wageningen University}
}
@article{kell2019evaluation,
title={Evaluation of Current and Alternative Harvest Control Rules for Blue Whiting Management using Hindcasting},
author={Kell, LT and Levontin, P},
year={2019},
url={https://www.pelagic-ac.org/media/pdf/Annex1_Blue%20whiting%20Hindcast%20final%20report.pdf}
}
@Inbook{Sculley2018,
author={Sculley, Michelle
and Yau, Annie},
chapter={Input data available for the North Pacific swordfish stock assessment in Stock Synthesis},
series={PIFSC working paper ; WP-18-002},
year={2018},
keywords={Catch effort},
keywords={Fish stock assessment},
keywords={Fisheries},
keywords={Swordfish},
abstract={The data provided to the ISC Billfish Working Group for the 2018 swordfish stock assessment in Stock Synthesis are summarized. An analysis of the Western Central North Pacific stock area standardized CPUE was performed to investigate potential conflict and correlations using the FLCore package. When there were multiple time periods of standardized CPUE indices for a fleet, they were combined into a single time series for this analysis. The results show moderate positive correlations between most indices. The highest positive correlation was between the US longline shallow set index and Taiwanese longline (0.76). There were five negative correlations, the largest of which was between the Taiwan longline and Japan longline area 1 indices (-0.33). Overall, there were not substantial conflicts in the CPUE time series, and all indices should be considered for inclusion in the Stock Synthesis base-case model.},
note={Professional Paper},
url={https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/17613}
}
@article{WINKER2018275,
title = "JABBA: Just Another Bayesian Biomass Assessment",
journal = "Fisheries Research",
volume = "204",
pages = "275 - 288",
year = "2018",
issn = "0165-7836",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2018.03.010",
url = "http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165783618300845",
author = "Henning Winker and Felipe Carvalho and Maia Kapur",
keywords = "Bayesian, Surplus production model, State-space framework, Stock assessment, JAGS",
abstract = "This study presents a new, open-source modelling software entitled ‘Just Another Bayesian Biomass Assessment’ (JABBA). JABBA can be used for biomass dynamic stock assessment applications, and has emerged from the development of a Bayesian State-Space Surplus Production Model framework, already applied in stock assessments of sharks, tuna, and billfishes around the world. JABBA presents a unifying, flexible framework for biomass dynamic modelling, runs quickly, and generates reproducible stock status estimates and diagnostic tools. Specific emphasis has been placed on flexibility for specifying alternative scenarios, achieving high stability and improved convergence rates. Default JABBA features include: 1) an integrated state-space tool for averaging and automatically fitting multiple catch per unit effort (CPUE) time series; 2) data-weighting through estimation of additional observation variance for individual or grouped CPUE; 3) selection of Fox, Schaefer, or Pella-Tomlinson production functions; 4) options to fix or estimate process and observation variance components; 5) model diagnostic tools; 6) future projections for alternative catch regimes; and 7) a suite of inbuilt graphics illustrating model fit diagnostics and stock status results. As a case study, JABBA is applied to the 2017 assessment input data for South Atlantic swordfish (Xiphias gladius). We envision that JABBA will become a widely used, open-source stock assessment tool, readily improved and modified by the global scientific community."
}
@article{doi:10.1111/2041-210X.13081,
author = {Carruthers, Thomas R. and Hordyk, Adrian R.},
title = {The Data-Limited Methods Toolkit (DLMtool): An R package for informing management of data-limited populations},
journal = {Methods in Ecology and Evolution},
volume = {9},
number = {12},
pages = {2388-2395},
keywords = {data moderate, data poor, management procedure, management strategy evaluation, population modelling, stock assessment},
doi = {10.1111/2041-210X.13081},
url = {https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/2041-210X.13081},
eprint = {https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/2041-210X.13081},
abstract = {Abstract A simulation-based approach known as management strategy evaluation (MSE) is increasingly used by resource managers to identify management procedures that are robust to uncertainties in system dynamics. The majority of global fish populations are data limited and there is large uncertainty over their population and exploitation dynamics. The Data-Limited Methods Toolkit (DLMtool) is an R package that allows for rapid and flexible MSE specification. The package consolidates a large number of existing data-limited management procedures and allows for rapid MSE testing of new approaches. The DLMtool package has supported transparent and rigorous decision-making for a number of data-limited populations, identifying robust management procedures and revealing performance trade-offs.},
year = {2018}
}
@article{UTIZI2018248,
title = "Impact assessment of EMFF measures on Good Environmental Status (GES) as defined by Italy",
journal = "Marine Policy",
volume = "88",
pages = "248 - 260",
year = "2018",
issn = "0308-597X",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.12.003",
url = "http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308597X17308059",
author = "Kizzi Utizi and Emilio Notti and Antonello Sala and Alessandro Buzzi and Ilaria Rodella and Umberto Simeoni and Corinne Corbau",
keywords = "CFP, MSFD, Expert judgment approach, Fisheries management, Sustainable fisheries and aquaculture",
abstract = "Fisheries involve an intensive use of European maritime regions according to the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP). The recent CFP reform has adopted an ecosystem-based approach to fisheries management that is characterised by enhanced regionalisation and multi-annual management plans. It aims to avoid the adverse environmental impacts of fishing activities, which are to be mitigated as far as possible, while the wasteful practice of discarding unwanted catches is to be phased out by 2019, at least for species with minimum landing size. The paper investigates the ability of selected measures, envisaged by the CFP reform through the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF), to sustain and attain the objectives of the European Marine Strategy Framework Directive, which aims at achieving Good Environmental Status (GES) in marine waters according to an ecosystem-based approach. The analysis uses an expert judgment-based approach and a specially devised questionnaire, where fisheries science and management experts were asked to assess the impact and interaction of selected EMFF measures on GES achievement as defined for the Italian seas. Their responses are discussed and compared with information coming from an extensive literature review. The results of the analysis highlight a general agreement between EMFF actions and GES objectives but also identify some potential conflicts."
}
@article{10.1371/journal.pone.0190015,
author = {Mackinson, Steven AND Platts, Mark AND Garcia, Clement AND Lynam, Christopher},
journal = {PLOS ONE},
publisher = {Public Library of Science},
title = {Evaluating the fishery and ecological consequences of the proposed North Sea multi-annual plan},
year = {2018},
month = {01},
volume = {13},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190015},
pages = {1-23},
abstract = {The possible impacts of the European Commission’s proposed North Sea Multi-Annual Plan are evaluated in terms of its likely outcomes to achieve management objectives for fishing pressure, species’ biomass, fishery yield, the landed value of key species and ecosystem objectives. The method applies management strategy evaluation procedures that employ an ecosystem model of the North Sea and its fisheries as the operating model. Taking five key dimensions of the proposed plan, it identifies those areas that are key to its successful performance. Overwhelmingly, choices in the options for the implementation of regulatory measures on discarding practices outweigh the effects of options related to fishing within ranges associated with ‘pretty good yield’, the way that biomass conservation safeguard mechanisms are applied and the timeframe for achieving fishing mortality targets. The impact of safeguard options and ranges in fishing mortality become important only when stock biomass is close to its reference points. The fifth dimension–taking into account wider conservation and ecosystem objectives—reveals that discard policy has a big impact on conservation species, but also that the type of harvest control rule can play an important role in limiting risks to stocks by ‘applying the brakes’ early. The consequences to fisheries however is heightened risk to their viability, thus exposing the sustainability trade-offs faced with balancing societal pressures for blue growth and enhanced conservation. It also reveals the wider ecosystem impacts that emphasise the connectivity between the demersal and pelagic realms, and thus, the importance of not treating the demersal NSMAP in isolation from other management plans. When stocks are below their biomass reference points, low F strategies lead to better long term economic performance, but for stocks consistently above biomass reference points, high F strategies lead to higher long term value. Nephrops and whiting often show contradictory responses to the strategies because changes in their predators abundance affects their abundance and success of their fisheries.},
number = {1},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0190015}
}
@article{10.1371/journal.pone.0190791,
author = {Jardim, Ernesto AND Eero, Margit AND Silva, Alexandra AND Ulrich, Clara AND Pawlowski, Lionel AND Holmes, Steven J. AND Ibaibarriaga, Leire AND De Oliveira, José A. A. AND Riveiro, Isabel AND Alzorriz, Nekane AND Citores, Leire AND Scott, Finlay AND Uriarte, Andres AND Carrera, Pablo AND Duhamel, Erwan AND Mosqueira, Iago},
journal = {PLOS ONE},
publisher = {Public Library of Science},
title = {Testing spatial heterogeneity with stock assessment models},
year = {2018},
month = {01},
volume = {13},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190791},
pages = {1-23},
abstract = {This paper describes a methodology that combines meta-population theory and stock assessment models to gain insights about spatial heterogeneity of the meta-population in an operational time frame. The methodology was tested with stochastic simulations for different degrees of connectivity between sub-populations and applied to two case studies, North Sea cod (Gadus morua) and Northeast Atlantic sardine (Sardina pilchardus). Considering that the biological components of a population can be partitioned into discrete spatial units, we extended this idea into a property of additivity of sub-population abundances. If the additivity results hold true for putative sub-populations, then assessment results based on sub-populations will provide information to develop and monitor the implementation of finer scale/local management. The simulation study confirmed that when sub-populations are independent and not too heterogeneous with regards to productivity, the sum of stock assessment model estimates of sub-populations’ SSB is similar to the SSB estimates of the meta-population. It also showed that a strong diffusion process can be detected and that the stronger the connection between SSB and recruitment, the better the diffusion process will be detected. On the other hand it showed that weak to moderate diffusion processes are not easy to identify and large differences between sub-populations productivities may be confounded with weak diffusion processes. The application to North Sea cod and Atlantic sardine exemplified how much insight can be gained. In both cases the results obtained were sufficiently robust to support the regional analysis.},
number = {1},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0190791}
}
@article{doi:10.1111/faf.12316,
author = {Walsh, Jessica C. and Minto, Cóilín and Jardim, Ernesto and Anderson, Sean C. and Jensen, Olaf P. and Afflerbach, Jamie and Dickey-Collas, Mark and Kleisner, Kristin M. and Longo, Catherine and Osio, Giacomo Chato and Selig, Elizabeth R. and Thorson, James T. and Rudd, Merrill B. and Papacostas, Katherine J. and Kittinger, John N. and Rosenberg, Andrew A. and Cooper, Andrew B.},
title = {Trade-offs for data-limited fisheries when using harvest strategies based on catch-only models},
journal = {Fish and Fisheries},
volume = {19},
number = {6},
pages = {1130-1146},
keywords = {catch-only model, data-limited, data-poor, harvest control rule, management strategy evaluation, superensemble},
doi = {10.1111/faf.12316},
url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/faf.12316},
eprint = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/faf.12316},
abstract = {Abstract Many of the world's fisheries are unassessed, with little information about population status or risk of overfishing. Unassessed fisheries are particularly predominant in developing countries and in small-scale fisheries, where they are important for food security. Several catch-only methods based on time series of fishery catch and commonly available life-history traits have been developed to estimate stock status (defined as biomass relative to biomass at maximum sustainable yield: B/BMSY). While their stock status performance has been extensively studied, performance of catch-only models as a management tool is unknown. We evaluated the extent to which a superensemble of three prominent catch-only models can provide a reliable basis for fisheries management and how performance compares across management strategies that control catch or fishing effort. We used a management strategy evaluation framework to determine whether a superensemble of catch-only models can reliably inform harvest control rules (HCRs). Across five simulated fish life histories and two harvest-dynamic types, catch-only models and HCR combinations reduced the risk of overfishing and increased the proportion of stocks above BMSY compared to business as usual, though often resulted in poor yields. Precautionary HCRs based on fishing effort were robust and insensitive to error in catch-only models, while catch-based HCRs caused high probabilities of overfishing and more overfished populations. Catch-only methods tended to overestimate B/BMSY for our simulated data sets. The catch-only superensemble combined with precautionary effort-based HCRs could be part of a stepping stone approach for managing some data-limited stocks while working towards more data-moderate assessment methods.},
year = {2018}
}
@article{doi:10.1002/nafm.10047,
author = {Sagarese, Skyler R. and Rios, Adyan B. and Cass-Calay, Shannon L. and Cummings, Nancie J. and Bryan, Meaghan D. and Stevens, Molly H. and Harford, William J. and McCarthy, Kevin J. and Matter, Vivian M.},
title = {Working Towards a Framework for Stock Evaluations in Data-Limited Fisheries},
journal = {North American Journal of Fisheries Management},
volume = {38},
number = {3},
pages = {507-537},
doi = {10.1002/nafm.10047},
url = {https://afspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/nafm.10047},
eprint = {https://afspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/nafm.10047},
abstract = {Abstract Data-limited approaches to managing fisheries are widespread in regions where insufficient data prevent traditional stock assessments from determining stock status with sufficient certainty to be useful for management. Where severe data limitations persist, a catch-only approach is commonly employed, such as in the U.S. Caribbean region. This approach, however, has not received the level of scrutiny required to determine the potential long-term risks (e.g., probability of overfishing) to fish stocks. In this study, we present a framework for comparison and implementation of data-limited methods, including the static Status Quo approach, which uses average catch landings. Candidate species for stock evaluation were identified through a data triage and included Yellowtail Snapper Ocyurus chrysurus (Puerto Rico), Queen Triggerfish Balistes vetula (St. Thomas and St. John), and Stoplight Parrotfish Sparisoma viride (St. Croix). Feasible data-limited methods, based on data availability and quality, included empirical indicator approaches using relative abundance (i.e., catch per unit effort) or mean length. Results from the management strategy evaluation support the use of adaptive data-limited methods, which incorporate feedback in contrast to the static Status Quo approach. The proposed framework can help guide the development of catch advice for dynamic fisheries management in data-limited regions.},
year = {2018}
}
@article{doi:10.1111/faf.12232,
author = {Nielsen, J Rasmus and Thunberg, Eric and Holland, Daniel S and Schmidt, Jorn O and Fulton, Elizabeth A and Bastardie, Francois and Punt, Andre E and Allen, Icarus and Bartelings, Heleen and Bertignac, Michel and Bethke, Eckhard and Bossier, Sieme and Buckworth, Rik and Carpenter, Griffin and Christensen, Asbjørn and Christensen, Villy and Da-Rocha, José M and Deng, Roy and Dichmont, Catherine and Doering, Ralf and Esteban, Aniol and Fernandes, Jose A. and Frost, Hans and Garcia, Dorleta and Gasche, Loic and Gascuel, Didier and Gourguet, Sophie and Groeneveld, Rolf A and Guillén, Jordi and Guyader, Olivier and Hamon, Katell G and Hoff, Ayoe and Horbowy, Jan and Hutton, Trevor and Lehuta, Sigrid and Little, L Richard and Lleonart, Jordi and Macher, Claire and Mackinson, Steven and Mahevas, Stephanie and Marchal, Paul and Mato-Amboage, Rosa and Mapstone, Bruce and Maynou, Francesc and Merzéréaud, Mathieu and Palacz, Artur and Pascoe, Sean and Paulrud, Anton and Plaganyi, Eva and Prellezo, Raul and van Putten, Elizabeth I and Quaas, Martin and Ravn-Jonsen, Lars and Sanchez, Sonia and Simons, Sarah and Thébaud, Olivier and Tomczak, Maciej T and Ulrich, Clara and van Dijk, Diana and Vermard, Youen and Voss, Rudi and Waldo, Staffan},
title = {Integrated ecological–economic fisheries models—Evaluation, review and challenges for implementation},
journal = {Fish and Fisheries},
volume = {19},
number = {1},
pages = {1-29},
keywords = {bio-economic models, comparative model evaluation, fisheries management advice, integrated ecological–economic fisheries models, marine spatial planning and cross-sector management, performance criteria and scales and risks, use and acceptance and implementation and communication and flexibility and complexity},
doi = {10.1111/faf.12232},
url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/faf.12232},
eprint = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/faf.12232},
abstract = {Abstract Marine ecosystems evolve under many interconnected and area-specific pressures. To fulfil society's intensifying and diversifying needs while ensuring ecologically sustainable development, more effective marine spatial planning and broader-scope management of marine resources is necessary. Integrated ecological–economic fisheries models (IEEFMs) of marine systems are needed to evaluate impacts and sustainability of potential management actions and understand, and anticipate ecological, economic and social dynamics at a range of scales from local to national and regional. To make these models most effective, it is important to determine how model characteristics and methods of communicating results influence the model implementation, the nature of the advice that can be provided and the impact on decisions taken by managers. This article presents a global review and comparative evaluation of 35 IEEFMs applied to marine fisheries and marine ecosystem resources to identify the characteristics that determine their usefulness, effectiveness and implementation. The focus is on fully integrated models that allow for feedbacks between ecological and human processes although not all the models reviewed achieve that. Modellers must invest more time to make models user friendly and to participate in management fora where models and model results can be explained and discussed. Such involvement is beneficial to all parties, leading to improvement of mo-dels and more effective implementation of advice, but demands substantial resources which must be built into the governance process. It takes time to develop effective processes for using IEEFMs requiring a long-term commitment to integrating multidisciplinary modelling advice into management decision-making.},
year = {2018}
}
@article{ ISI:000404555100008,
Author = {Anderson, Sean C. and Cooper, Andrew B. and Jensen, Olaf P. and Minto,
Coilin and Thorson, James T. and Walsh, Jessica C. and Afflerbach, Jamie
and Dickey-Collas, Mark and Kleisner, Kristin M. and Longo, Catherine
and Osio, Giacomo Chato and Ovando, Daniel and Mosqueira, Iago and
Rosenberg, Andrew A. and Selig, Elizabeth R.},
Title = {{Improving estimates of population status and trend with superensemble
models}},
Journal = {{FISH AND FISHERIES}},
Year = {{2017}},
Volume = {{18}},
Number = {{4}},
Pages = {{732-741}},
Month = {{JUL}},
Abstract = {{Fishery managers must often reconcile conflicting estimates of
population status and trend. Superensemble models, commonly used in
climate and weather forecasting, may provide an effective solution. This
approach uses predictions from multiple models as covariates in an
additional ``superensemble{''} model fitted to known data. We evaluated
the potential for ensemble averages and superensemble models (ensemble
methods) to improve estimates of population status and trend for
fisheries. We fit four widely applicable data-limited models that
estimate stock biomass relative to equilibrium biomass at maximum
sustainable yield (B/BMSY). We combined these estimates of recent
fishery status and trends in B/BMSY with four ensemble methods: an
ensemble average and three superensembles (a linear model, a random
forest and a boosted regression tree). We trained our superensembles on
5,760 simulated stocks and tested them with cross-validation and against
a global database of 249 stock assessments. Ensemble methods
substantially improved estimates of population status and trend. Random
forest and boosted regression trees performed the best at estimating
population status: inaccuracy (median absolute proportional error)
decreased from 0.42 -0.56 to 0.32 -0.33, rank-order correlation between
predicted and true status improved from 0.02 - 0.32 to 0.44 - 0.48 and
bias (median proportional error) declined from - 0.22 - 0.31 to - 0.12 -
0.03. We found similar improvements when predicting trend and when
applying the simulation-trained superensembles to catch data for global
fish stocks. Superensembles can optimally leverage multiple model
predictions; however, they must be tested, formed from a diverse set of
accurate models and built on a data set representative of the
populations to which they are applied.}},
Publisher = {{WILEY}},
Address = {{111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA}},
Type = {{Article}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Anderson, SC (Reprint Author), Univ Washington, Sch Aquat \& Fishery Sci, Seattle, WA USA.
Anderson, Sean C.; Cooper, Andrew B.; Walsh, Jessica C., Simon Fraser Univ, Sch Resource \& Environm Management, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Jensen, Olaf P., Rutgers State Univ, Inst Marine Coastal Sci, New Brunswick, NJ USA.
Minto, Coilin, Galway Mayo Inst Technol, Marine \& Freshwater Res Ctr, Galway, Ireland.
Thorson, James T., NOAA, Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, Northwest Fisheries Sci Ctr, Fisheries Resource Anal \& Monitoring Div, Seattle, WA 98112 USA.
Afflerbach, Jamie, Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Natl Ctr Ecol Anal \& Synth, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA.
Dickey-Collas, Mark, Int Council Explorat Sea, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Dickey-Collas, Mark, Tech Univ Denmark DTU, DTU Aqua Natl Inst Aquat Resources, Charlottenlund, Denmark.
Kleisner, Kristin M., NOAA, Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, Ecosyst Assessment Program, Northeast Fisheries Sci Ctr, Woods Hole, MA 02543 USA.
Longo, Catherine, Marine Stewarship Council, London, England.
Osio, Giacomo Chato; Mosqueira, Iago, European Commiss, DG Joint Res Ctr, Directorate Sustainable Resources D, Unit Water \& Marine Resources D 02, Ispra, Italy.
Ovando, Daniel, Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Bren Sch Environm Sci \& Management, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA.
Rosenberg, Andrew A., Union Concerned Scientists, Cambridge, MA USA.
Selig, Elizabeth R., Conservat Int, Arlington, VA USA.}},
DOI = {{10.1111/faf.12200}},
ISSN = {{1467-2960}},
EISSN = {{1467-2979}},
Keywords = {{CMSY; data-limited fisheries; ensemble methods; multimodel averaging;
population dynamics; sustainable resource management}},
Keywords-Plus = {{SEASONAL CLIMATE FORECASTS; MULTIMODEL SUPERENSEMBLE; EXTINCTION RISK;
FISHERIES; SELECTION; ENSEMBLE; OCEANS}},
Research-Areas = {{Fisheries}},
Web-of-Science-Categories = {{Fisheries}},
Author-Email = {{[email protected]}},
ResearcherID-Numbers = {{Dickey-Collas, Mark/A-8036-2008}},
Funding-Acknowledgement = {{Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation}},
Funding-Text = {{Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{62}},
Times-Cited = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{6}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{6}},
Journal-ISO = {{Fish. Fish.}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{EZ2QR}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000404555100008}},
OA = {{No}},
DA = {{2017-08-17}},
}
@article{ ISI:000397351500022,
Author = {Ruiz, Javier and Maria Rincon, Margarita and Castilla, David and Ramos,
Fernando and Garcia del Hoyo, Juan Jose},
Title = {{Biological and economic vulnerabilities of fixed TACs in small pelagics:
An analysis of the European anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) in the Gulf
of Cadiz}},
Journal = {{MARINE POLICY}},
Year = {{2017}},
Volume = {{78}},
Pages = {{171-180}},
Month = {{APR}},
Abstract = {{A coupled population dynamics and economic model is applied to the purse
seine anchovy-fishery in the Gulf of Cadiz. The model simulates the
population dynamics, landings and profits on a probabilistic frame.
These simulations are used to assess the biological and economic
consequences of an individual quota Management framework enveloped by a
fixed Total Allowable Catch (TAC), the present strategy used to manage
this stock in the Spanish fishery. Our results accurately indicate that
this strategy magnifies the biological and economic vulnerabilities
associated with the exploitation of the stock, thus jeopardizing the
sustainability of this fishery. Alternative strategies, such as an
adaptive TAC, are explored. The results indicate that even a basic
implementation of an adaptive TAC seems more favorable than the present
strategy in the necessary equilibrium between profits and
sustainability. This paper provides tools and an assessment that may
also be useful for other small pelagic fisheries.}},
Publisher = {{ELSEVIER SCI LTD}},
Address = {{THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, OXON, ENGLAND}},
Type = {{Article}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Ruiz, J (Reprint Author), Consejo Super Invest Cientf ICMAN CSIC, Dept Coastal Ecol \& Management, Inst Ciencias Marinas Andalucia, Cadiz, Spain.
Ruiz, Javier; Maria Rincon, Margarita, Consejo Super Invest Cientf ICMAN CSIC, Dept Coastal Ecol \& Management, Inst Ciencias Marinas Andalucia, Cadiz, Spain.
Castilla, David; Garcia del Hoyo, Juan Jose, Univ Huelva, Fac Ciencias Empresariales, Campus La Merced,Plaza Merced 11, Huelva 21071, Spain.
Ramos, Fernando, Inst Espanol Oceanog, Ctr Oceanog Cadiz, Muelle Levante S-N,Apdo 2609, Cadiz 11006, Spain.}},
DOI = {{10.1016/j.marpol.2017.01.022}},
ISSN = {{0308-597X}},
EISSN = {{1872-9460}},
Keywords = {{Bioeconomic model; Adaptive TAC; Engraulis encrasicolus; European
anchovy; Small pelagics; ICES Subdivision IXa}},
Keywords-Plus = {{INDIVIDUAL-BASED MODEL; SW SPAIN; SPATIOTEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION;
ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABLES; FISHERIES; MANAGEMENT; L.; ESTUARY; GROWTH}},
Research-Areas = {{Environmental Sciences \& Ecology; International Relations}},
Web-of-Science-Categories = {{Environmental Studies; International Relations}},
Author-Email = {{[email protected]}},
ORCID-Numbers = {{Garcia del Hoyo, Juan Jose/0000-0002-6132-8566}},
Funding-Acknowledgement = {{European Union {[}613571/MAREFRAME]}},
Funding-Text = {{The research leading to these results has received funding from the
European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7-KBBE-2013) under the
grant agreement 613571/MAREFRAME project. However, the paper does not
necessarily reflect EC views and in no way anticipates the Commissions
future policy in the area. We thank Jose C. Macias, from i-Fish
Consulting \& Market S.L., for useful information and data on fleet
operations.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{46}},
Times-Cited = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{2}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{2}},
Journal-ISO = {{Mar. Pol.}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{EP4LH}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000397351500022}},
OA = {{No}},
DA = {{2017-08-17}},
}
@article{ ISI:000398110100006,
Author = {Garcia, Dorleta and Prellezo, Raul and Sampedro, Paz and Da-Rocha, Jose
Maria and Castro, Jose and Cervino, Santiago and Garcia-Cutrin, Javier
and Gutierrez, Maria-Jose},
Title = {{Bioeconomic multistock reference points as a tool for overcoming the
drawbacks of the landing obligation}},
Journal = {{ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE}},
Year = {{2017}},
Volume = {{74}},
Number = {{2}},
Pages = {{511-524}},
Month = {{MAR}},
Abstract = {{The landing obligation policy was one of the major innovations
introduced in the last Common Fisheries Policy reform in Europe. It is
foreseen that the policy will affect the use of fishing opportunities
and hence the economic performance of the fleets. The problem with
fishing opportunities could be solved if single-stock total allowable
catches (TACs) could be achieved simultaneously for all the stocks. In
this study, we evaluate the economic impact of the landing obligation
policy on the Spanish demersal fleet operating in the Iberian Sea
region. To generate TAC advice, we used two sets of maximum sustainable
yield (MSY) reference points, the single-stock MSY reference points
defined by ICES and a set of multistock reference points calculated
simultaneously using a bioeconomic optimization model. We found that the
impact of the landing obligation is time and fleet dependent and highly
influenced by assumptions about fleet dynamics. At fishery level,
multistock reference points mitigate the decrease in the net present
value generated by the implementation of the landing obligation. However
at fleet level, the effect depends on the fleet itself and the period.
To ensure the optimum use of fishing opportunities, the landing
obligation should be accompanied by a management system that guarantees
consistency between single-stock TACs. In this regard, multistock
reference points represent an improvement over those currently in use.
However, further investigation is necessary to enhance performance both
at fleet level and in the long term.}},