You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As explainated in #86 (comment), users may wish to add more records to name table. But doing that via "named" options clutter API & code significantly.
We need something more simple AND "unlimited". At first glance, just pass array or desired records (but this should be discussed). What should be considered:
Low level format.
Record can look like [ platformID, encodingID, languageID, nameID, string ]
Probably, string should be auto-encoded according to provided data
Probably, short variant [ nameID, string ] should be supported to auto-create 2 records for Win & Mac platforms
Revisit named shortcuts
I would keep existing shortcuts only, and redirect the rest for "low level api"
Questions
Should most of records be "duplicated" for Win/Mac platforms, or single platform (Unicode) is enough?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As explainated in #86 (comment), users may wish to add more records to name table. But doing that via "named" options clutter API & code significantly.
We need something more simple AND "unlimited". At first glance, just pass array or desired records (but this should be discussed). What should be considered:
[ platformID, encodingID, languageID, nameID, string ]
[ nameID, string ]
should be supported to auto-create 2 records for Win & Mac platformsQuestions
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: