You need to use the correct branch of c2ffi
for your version of
LLVM/Clang:
- 3.4: branch
llvm-3.4
(unsupported) - 3.5: branch
llvm-3.5
(unsupported) - 3.6: branch
llvm-3.6
(unsupported) - 3.7: branch
llvm-3.7
(unsupported) - 4.0.0: branch
llvm-4.0.0
(deprecated) - 5.0.0: branch
llvm-5.0.0
current
Developement will always take place in llvm-X.Y
, according to the
appropriate version of LLVM. The master branch has been
removed. Check out the appropriate version for your LLVM.
This is a tool for extracting definitions from C, C++, and Objective C headers for use with foreign function call interfaces. For instance:
#define FOO (1 << 2)
const int BAR = FOO + 10;
typedef struct my_point {
int x;
int y;
int odd_value[BAR + 1];
} my_point_t;
enum some_values {
a_value,
another_value,
yet_another_value
};
void do_something(my_point_t *p, int x, int y);
Running c2ffi
on this, we can get the following JSON output:
[
{ "tag": "const", "name": "BAR", "location": "/home/rpav/test.h:3:11", "type": { "tag": ":int" }, "value": 14 },
{ "tag": "struct", "name": "my_point", "id": 0, "location": "/home/rpav/test.h:5:16", "bit-size": 544, "bit-alignment": 32, "fields": [{ "tag": "field", "name": "x", "bit-offset": 0, "bit-size": 32, "bit-alignment": 32, "type": { "tag": ":int" } }, { "tag": "field", "name": "y", "bit-offset": 32, "bit-size": 32, "bit-alignment": 32, "type": { "tag": ":int" } }, { "tag": "field", "name": "odd_value", "bit-offset": 64, "bit-size": 480, "bit-alignment": 32, "type": { "tag": ":array", "type": { "tag": ":int" }, "size": 15 } }] },
{ "tag": "typedef", "name": "my_point_t", "location": "/home/rpav/test.h:9:3", "type": { "tag": ":struct", "name": "my_point", "id": 0 } },
{ "tag": "enum", "name": "some_values", "id": 0, "location": "/home/rpav/test.h:11:6", "fields": [{ "tag": "field", "name": "a_value", "value": 0 }, { "tag": "field", "name": "another_value", "value": 1 }, { "tag": "field", "name": "yet_another_value", "value": 2 }] },
{ "tag": "function", "name": "do_something", "location": "/home/rpav/test.h:17:6", "variadic": false, "parameters": [{ "tag": "parameter", "name": "p", "type": { "tag": ":pointer", "type": { "tag": "my_point_t" } } }, { "tag": "parameter", "name": "x", "type": { "tag": ":int" } }, { "tag": "parameter", "name": "y", "type": { "tag": ":int" } }], "return-type": { "tag": ":void" } }
]
Because this uses Clang as a parser, the C, C++, or Objective C is fully and correctly parsed.
This requires Clang and LLVM of the appropriate version, which you can obtain from the repository, by download.
You should be able to build c2ffi with out-of-the-box clang-3.7 on your dist. However, see "Notes" below for some things to watch out for.
c2ffi
uses cmake. This is relatively easy to use. However, if you
built clang++
with special options (e.g., libc++, libc++abi,
libcxxrt, etc), see Notes below.
c2ffi/ $ mkdir build
c2ffi/ $ cd build/
build/ $ cmake ..
:
: Output
:
build/ $ make
:
: Output
:
build/ $ ./bin/c2ffi
Usage: c2ffi [options ...] FILE
Options:
-I, --include Add a "LOCAL" include path
-i, --sys-include Add a <system> include path
-D, --driver Specify an output driver (default: json)
-o, --output Specify an output file (default: stdout)
-M, --macro-file Specify a file for macro definition output
-N, --namespace Specify target namespace/package/etc
-A, --arch Specify the target triple for LLVM
(default: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
-x, --lang Specify language (c, c++, objc, objc++)
Drivers: json, sexp, null
Now you have a working c2ffi
. If not, see Notes.
-
Packaged clang binaries should now work. But, because these appear to be build with gcc, it is not possible to build c2ffi with clang! So use gcc in this case.
-
You need llvm/clang dev libraries.
libclang.so
is not enough. If you don't havelibclangAST.a
, you have to install any-dev
type packages in your dist. Not all dists may package these. -
If you build with clang and get link errors about ABI functions, you may need to link to
-lc++abi
or similar. -
If you build with clang and get link errors about random LLVM and Clang functions, you need to build with gcc, because your clang was built with gcc.
-
Building on OSX may require specifying
LIBCLANG_CPPFLAGS=/usr/local/include
or wherever you installed LLVM. And you will have to build LLVM, because Apple's build does not seem to include the appropriate headers or libraries. (Not verified recently.) -
If you're seeing compiler errors, you probably checked out the wrong branch. Verify your
clang -v
vs yourgit branch
.
There are generally two steps to using c2ffi
:
-
Generate output for a particular header or file, gathering macro definitions (with the
-M <file>.c
parameter) -
Generate output for macro definitions by running
c2ffi
again on the generated file (without-M
)
This is due to the preprocessor being a huge hack (see below). However, once this is done, you should have two files with all the necessary data for your FFI bindings.
Currently JSON is the default output. This is in a rather wordy hierarchical format, with each object having a "tag" field which describes it. All objects are contained in an array. This should make it fairly easy (or at least far easier than parsing C yourself) to transform into language-specific bindings.
This format may be documented at some point, but for now, you'll have
to look at the input and the output! I recommend a pretty-printing
reformatter for the JSON. Patches to produce prettier output will be
accepted. ;-)
You may encounter errors if the code in question is not correct. Presumably, most of the time, you will be running c2ffi on existing, known-working code.
In this case, the most likely "error" you will encounter will look like this:
Skipping invalid Decl:
FunctionDecl 0x21e05f0 </usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/gmacros.h:328:22, /usr/include/glib-2.0/glib/deprecated/gthread.h:282:65> g_cond_timed_wait 'int (GCond *, GMutex *, GTimeVal *)' extern
|-ParmVarDecl 0x21e0480 <line:280:42, col:58> cond 'GCond *'
|-ParmVarDecl 0x21e04f0 <line:281:42, col:58> mutex 'GMutex *'
`-ParmVarDecl 0x21e0560 <line:282:42, col:58> timeval 'GTimeVal *' invalid
This usually means that Clang didn't find a header, and it doesn't know about one of the types referenced. Look at the top of your error output. Missing header errors will often appear there.
You should specify any necessary additional include paths with
-i
(for system headers, i.e. those using <brackets>
) or -I
(for
local headers, i.e. those using "quotes"
).
Generally, any issue relating to an error with C, includes, or the like is not a bug with c2ffi. However, c2ffi should not abort or crash; any such error is certainly a bug with c2ffi.
C support should be fairly complete. Formerly variadic functions and bitfield support was incomplete. These should now be fully-supported.
Note however that bitfield support is platform- and sometimes compiler-specific; if your platform ABI does not provide a strict definition, expect the layout of structs which use bitfields to be undefined.
C++ support should be fairly complete. This outputs everything as it normally would for C, as well as namespace, classes, methods, and class hierarchy (including base class offsets).
Template support is limited to instantiated templates (including
both classes/structs/unions and functions). c2ffi
can output a new
.hpp
file using the -T
parameter with explicit instantiations for
those it finds declared but not instantiated. E.g.,
template<typename T>
class C { T t; };
typedef class C<int> C_int;
Using c2ffi -T file.T.hpp ...
, this will produce the following,
which #includes
the original to produce a complete definition:
#include "original.cpp"
template class C<int>;
Note: The behavior of this has changed. This used to produce a file which did not include the original. You can now use -D null
to output only the .T.hpp
file, and then produce full output from that. This simpifies the process.
Basic support at least exists. I am not an Objective C person and don't really have a great way to use or test the output, or verify that all the useful features are included.
If you send me example source along with some information about what would be useful, I can try to accommodate. If you write a translator for the JSON to an ObjC bridge, let me know and I will link it below.
Untested.
Processing the JSON into a usable format is fairly straightforward.
Some care must be given to handle anonymous types (e.g., typedef struct { ... } type_t;
), but writing these is fairly trivial
overall.
The following language bindings exist for c2ffi
:
-
cl-autowrap: Create bindings in Commonn Lisp from a
.h
withc2ffi
using a simple(c-include "file.h")
-
c2ffi-ruby: Uses the JSON from c2ffi to produce a nicely-formatted Ruby file for ruby-ffi.
If you're feeling motivated, it should be fairly simple to produce a
new output driver. Look in src/drivers/
and you can see the source
for JSON, Sexp (lisp symbolic expressions), and possibly some others.
You will need to do the following:
-
Create a new subclass of OutputDriver in
src/drivers/
; copying one of the existing ones is probably the easiest. -
Add this file to
src/Makefile.am
-
Add the factory function to
src/OutputDriver.cpp
. -
Write your code!
The preprocessor handling is, as was noted, a huge hack. This is due
entirely to the fact that #define
macros can contain just about
anything, and thus it's not easy to tell if they are useful values or
syntax hackery.
For this, c2ffi
uses a simple heuristic:
-
If there are arithmetic operators (
+
,-
,*
,<<
, etc), parens, numbers, and identifiers, it's treated as "useful". -
If only ints are found, it's treated as an
__int128_t
; if floats are found, it's treated as adouble
; if a string is found, achar*
Why the odd __int128_t
? Because without more parsing (and
technically, without context), it can't be determined as signed or
unsigned. So this is declared with very large capacity which will
hold the entire range of signed and unsigned 64-bit ints.
If you're dealing with unsigned 128-bit int constants, you'll have to do it yourself. I personally haven't seen any.
This is currently GPL2, but it will almost certainly be moved to LGPL2, as I would like to make a shared library which you can load definitions at runtime. It may be moved to BSD or similar at some point in the future.