Would it not be better to define a separate scriptImplementation in the Freeplane gradle plugin? #10
Unanswered
HaaiHenkie
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 2 comments
-
I submitted pull request #11. The only thing I hesitate about is line 78-79. It seems logical to do this, but do not understand completely what this does. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
I now understand the purpose of line 78-79: it adds dependencies on the jars from the Freeplane installation directory to the source set. This should also be te case for the test source set, so added the original lines as line 80-81 in extra commit to pull request #11. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
In the Freeplane gradle plugin, the source of the scripts is included in te testImplementation configuration:
Now any dependencies you define for testImplementation will also apply to the Freeplane scripts. Wouldn't it be better to define a separate scriptImplementation. E.g. :
Obviously some other amendments have to be made to the Freeplane gradle plugin.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions