-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Some spatial operators may be clarified (overlaps, covers, ...) #159
Labels
Comments
I will handle this in two weeks. |
'overlaps' and 'crosses' seem to exactly have the same behavior: Here is the code:
|
@ptaillandier can you provide us the documentation of the library used for those operators ? I think it could greatly help our understanding of the subtleties |
maybe it's related to the objects' dimensions, what happens with those operators between lines or with points ? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Is your request related to a problem? Please describe.
Currently, there are several useful spatial operators, but for some of them, it's difficult to exactly understand what they exactly do or what is the difference between them, even if it's easy to get the main idea.
Those operators are:
and their collection equivalents covering, crossing, touching, overlapping, partially_ovelapping.
Some of them are very clear, but the difference between intersects, partially_overlaps, overlaps and covers maybe difficult to understand. Are the last two the same ?
Is it possible to include a figure in the documentation, that would help understand ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: