-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
split iron-siderophore transport terms from siderophore export from cell #29742
Comments
Hi Val, Thanks for looking into this. I had looked before but I know it was not complete.
Do you mean you want to remove GO:0015891 siderophore transport as a child of iron coordination entity transport ? ?
This is what I also thought, but there seem to be transporters specific for the export of the 'naked' siderophore, in orer to re-uptake later. If this term is not avilable anymore, how do you recommend we annotate these transporters? I'd like to get rid of all 'transport' terms that dont mention. mechanism - either 'transmembrane' or endo/exocytosis. So the I think siderophore transport can be obsoleted and replaced by the TM version? |
yes
I think maybe we should keep the individual transporters (or create them) GO:0015687 ferric-hydroxamate import into cell the 'naked' siderophores won't have 'ferric' in the term name
Agreed but I'd like to keep and rename siderophore transport and obsolete the TM version. They have been used identically but the TM version has fewer annotations. but siderophore transport would be renamed to "siderophore export across plasma membrane" |
basket |
It is worth noting that iron-siderophore import can also apparently be by endocytosis (Partiularly in pathogens?) , although I have not =seen any annotated examples. |
Yes - that was another complication with these terms. |
This is a broader transport question. Right now we mostly dont have directionality in the MF branch. This needs to be applied consistently, whatever we do. I had started to move all directionality into BP, but that is not yet complete. There are still 'influx' and 'efflux' transporters. |
I think in this instance it would be OK though ferric-hydroxamate importer (or transporter?) activity part of GO:0033214 siderophore-dependent iron import into cell it would be I could not remember if the direction belonged on MF or BP |
siderophore (ferritin) needs to be exported before it can be imported as siderophore-iron. Currently, according to the fission yeast expert, despite extensive work the fungal exporter is unknown (but I need to put this in the GO-CAM as a pathway hole). "In bacteria, there are few proteins known for this", (however, I have been unable to locate these in GO annotation and it seems that the fungal exporters are probably not closely related).
Some issues:
(should we have uptake in MF or BP I am still unclear on this?)
Basically, I need a term that I can use for export of the ferrichrome siderophore (or just siderophore), but none of the available terms are suitable because they mention uptake, iron, or have an import parent. These all need to be disambiguated. For example, "ferrichrome transmembrane transporter activity," which I have used temporarily, has a "ferrichrome import into cell" parent, which is a true path violation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: