Should all cases be verified?

[aimeehan1]

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
A clear and concise description of what the problem is.

I am frustrated when I hit bottlenecks, or I am the bottleneck!

As a senior curator and Curation Team Lead, there is a large responsibility to ensure timely and accurate data entry for ALL cases in our dataset. I review cases in my queue as a Senior, but I also go back and review cases that have been completed by others. This level of oversight is not realistic or sustainable when wearing multiple hats and having competing responsibilities and priorities. Data sat in my queue for 24-48h and I had to reach out to another senior curator for support.

Describe the solution you'd like
A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.

We hit a bottleneck at the verification step. Is this a tradeoff we are willing to make -- accuracy for timeliness? Do all cases need to be verified? We need to have this discussion.

Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.

Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

[jim-sheldon]

Also, can the devs help? Could you show us how you verify cases?

[aimeehan1]

@JacqSauer Can i ask you to start the write out the review / verification process for seniors?

[JacqSauer]

Hi team! An overview and detailed description of the verification process for senior curators can be found here.

Pathway: G.h shared Googled Drive > 2_Outbreak Response> G.h Outbreak Simulation > SimEX - Curation Team Feedback

[aimeehan1]

@JacqSauer what a great start! Thank you for working to capture the process. What if we start to turn this detail into the review checklist that Sadie was talking about? @sadiekelly

[stanislaw-zakrzewski]

Related to #93