Merge branch 'main' into fix-repo-file-table

# Conflicts:
#	web_src/css/index.css

models/db/search.go

@@ -26,8 +26,10 @@ const (
 	SearchOrderByForksReverse          SearchOrderBy = "num_forks DESC"
 )
 
-const (
-	// Which means a condition to filter the records which don't match any id.
-	// It's different from zero which means the condition could be ignored.
-	NoConditionID = -1
-)
+// NoConditionID means a condition to filter the records which don't match any id.
+// eg: "milestone_id=-1" means "find the items without any milestone.
+const NoConditionID int64 = -1
+
+// NonExistingID means a condition to match no result (eg: a non-existing user)
+// It doesn't use -1 or -2 because they are used as builtin users.
+const NonExistingID int64 = -1000000

models/fixtures/review.yml

@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
   reviewer_id: 1
   issue_id: 2
   content: "Demo Review"
+  original_author_id: 0
   updated_unix: 946684810
   created_unix: 946684810
 -
@@ -12,6 +13,7 @@
   reviewer_id: 534543
   issue_id: 534543
   content: "Invalid Review #1"
+  original_author_id: 0
   updated_unix: 946684810
   created_unix: 946684810
 -
@@ -20,6 +22,7 @@
   reviewer_id: 1
   issue_id: 343545
   content: "Invalid Review #2"
+  original_author_id: 0
   updated_unix: 946684810
   created_unix: 946684810
 -
@@ -28,6 +31,7 @@
   reviewer_id: 1
   issue_id: 2
   content: "Pending Review"
+  original_author_id: 0
   updated_unix: 946684810
   created_unix: 946684810
 -
@@ -36,6 +40,7 @@
   reviewer_id: 1
   issue_id: 3
   content: "New review 1"
+  original_author_id: 0
   updated_unix: 946684810
   created_unix: 946684810
 -
@@ -61,8 +66,8 @@
   type: 1
   reviewer_id: 4
   issue_id: 3
-  original_author_id: 0
   content: "New review 5"
+  original_author_id: 0
   commit_id: 8091a55037cd59e47293aca02981b5a67076b364
   stale: true
   updated_unix: 946684813
@@ -73,16 +78,17 @@
   reviewer_id: 2
   issue_id: 3
   content: "New review 3 rejected"
+  original_author_id: 0
   updated_unix: 946684814
   created_unix: 946684814
-  original_author_id: 0
 
 -
   id: 10
   type: 3
   reviewer_id: 100
   issue_id: 3
   content: "a deleted user's review"
+  original_author_id: 0
   official: true
   updated_unix: 946684815
   created_unix: 946684815
@@ -112,6 +118,7 @@
   reviewer_id: 5
   issue_id: 11
   content: "old review from user5"
+  original_author_id: 0
   updated_unix: 946684820
   created_unix: 946684820
 
@@ -121,6 +128,7 @@
   reviewer_id: 5
   issue_id: 11
   content: "duplicate review from user5 (latest)"
+  original_author_id: 0
   updated_unix: 946684830
   created_unix: 946684830
 
@@ -130,6 +138,7 @@
   reviewer_id: 6
   issue_id: 11
   content: "singular review from org6 and final review for this pr"
+  original_author_id: 0
   updated_unix: 946684831
   created_unix: 946684831
 
@@ -139,6 +148,7 @@
   reviewer_id: 20
   issue_id: 20
   content: "review request for user20"
+  original_author_id: 0
   updated_unix: 946684832
   created_unix: 946684832
 
@@ -148,6 +158,7 @@
   reviewer_id: 20
   issue_id: 20
   content: "review approved by user20"
+  original_author_id: 0
   updated_unix: 946684833
   created_unix: 946684833
 
@@ -158,6 +169,7 @@
   reviewer_team_id: 5
   issue_id: 20
   content: "review request for team5"
+  original_author_id: 0
   updated_unix: 946684834
   created_unix: 946684834
 
@@ -168,6 +180,7 @@
   reviewer_team_id: 0
   issue_id: 20
   content: "review request for user15"
+  original_author_id: 0
   updated_unix: 946684835
   created_unix: 946684835
 
@@ -177,6 +190,7 @@
   reviewer_id: 1
   issue_id: 2
   content: "Review Comment"
+  original_author_id: 0
   updated_unix: 946684810
   created_unix: 946684810
 
@@ -186,6 +200,7 @@
   reviewer_id: 5
   issue_id: 3
   content: "reviewed by user5"
+  original_author_id: 0
   commit_id: 4a357436d925b5c974181ff12a994538ddc5a269
   updated_unix: 946684816
   created_unix: 946684816
@@ -196,5 +211,6 @@
   reviewer_id: 5
   issue_id: 3
   content: "review request for user5"
+  original_author_id: 0
   updated_unix: 946684817
   created_unix: 946684817

models/issues/issue_search.go

@@ -27,8 +27,8 @@ type IssuesOptions struct { //nolint
 	RepoIDs            []int64 // overwrites RepoCond if the length is not 0
 	AllPublic          bool    // include also all public repositories
 	RepoCond           builder.Cond
-	AssigneeID         int64
-	PosterID           int64
+	AssigneeID         optional.Option[int64]
+	PosterID           optional.Option[int64]
 	MentionedID        int64
 	ReviewRequestedID  int64
 	ReviewedID         int64
@@ -231,15 +231,8 @@ func applyConditions(sess *xorm.Session, opts *IssuesOptions) {
 		sess.And("issue.is_closed=?", opts.IsClosed.Value())
 	}
 
-	if opts.AssigneeID > 0 {
-		applyAssigneeCondition(sess, opts.AssigneeID)
-	} else if opts.AssigneeID == db.NoConditionID {
-		sess.Where("issue.id NOT IN (SELECT issue_id FROM issue_assignees)")
-	}
-
-	if opts.PosterID > 0 {
-		applyPosterCondition(sess, opts.PosterID)
-	}
+	applyAssigneeCondition(sess, opts.AssigneeID)
+	applyPosterCondition(sess, opts.PosterID)
 
 	if opts.MentionedID > 0 {
 		applyMentionedCondition(sess, opts.MentionedID)
@@ -359,13 +352,27 @@ func issuePullAccessibleRepoCond(repoIDstr string, userID int64, org *organizati
 	return cond
 }
 
-func applyAssigneeCondition(sess *xorm.Session, assigneeID int64) {
-	sess.Join("INNER", "issue_assignees", "issue.id = issue_assignees.issue_id").
-		And("issue_assignees.assignee_id = ?", assigneeID)
+func applyAssigneeCondition(sess *xorm.Session, assigneeID optional.Option[int64]) {
+	// old logic: 0 is also treated as "not filtering assignee", because the "assignee" was read as FormInt64
+	if !assigneeID.Has() || assigneeID.Value() == 0 {
+		return
+	}
+	if assigneeID.Value() == db.NoConditionID {
+		sess.Where("issue.id NOT IN (SELECT issue_id FROM issue_assignees)")
+	} else {
+		sess.Join("INNER", "issue_assignees", "issue.id = issue_assignees.issue_id").
+			And("issue_assignees.assignee_id = ?", assigneeID.Value())
+	}
 }
 
-func applyPosterCondition(sess *xorm.Session, posterID int64) {
-	sess.And("issue.poster_id=?", posterID)
+func applyPosterCondition(sess *xorm.Session, posterID optional.Option[int64]) {
+	if !posterID.Has() {
+		return
+	}
+	// poster doesn't need to support db.NoConditionID(-1), so just use the value as-is
+	if posterID.Has() {
+		sess.And("issue.poster_id=?", posterID.Value())
+	}
 }
 
 func applyMentionedCondition(sess *xorm.Session, mentionedID int64) {

models/issues/issue_stats.go

@@ -151,15 +151,9 @@ func applyIssuesOptions(sess *xorm.Session, opts *IssuesOptions, issueIDs []int6
 
 	applyProjectCondition(sess, opts)
 
-	if opts.AssigneeID > 0 {
-		applyAssigneeCondition(sess, opts.AssigneeID)
-	} else if opts.AssigneeID == db.NoConditionID {
-		sess.Where("issue.id NOT IN (SELECT issue_id FROM issue_assignees)")
-	}
+	applyAssigneeCondition(sess, opts.AssigneeID)
 
-	if opts.PosterID > 0 {
-		applyPosterCondition(sess, opts.PosterID)
-	}
+	applyPosterCondition(sess, opts.PosterID)
 
 	if opts.MentionedID > 0 {
 		applyMentionedCondition(sess, opts.MentionedID)

models/issues/issue_test.go

@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ import (
 	repo_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/repo"
 	"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/unittest"
 	user_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/user"
+	"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/optional"
 	"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/setting"
 
 	"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
@@ -155,7 +156,7 @@ func TestIssues(t *testing.T) {
 	}{
 		{
 			issues_model.IssuesOptions{
-				AssigneeID: 1,
+				AssigneeID: optional.Some(int64(1)),
 				SortType:   "oldest",
 			},
 			[]int64{1, 6},

models/issues/pull_list.go

@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ import (
 	"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/log"
 	"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/util"
 
+	"xorm.io/builder"
 	"xorm.io/xorm"
 )
 
@@ -240,6 +241,64 @@ func (prs PullRequestList) GetIssueIDs() []int64 {
 	})
 }
 
+func (prs PullRequestList) LoadReviewCommentsCounts(ctx context.Context) (map[int64]int, error) {
+	issueIDs := prs.GetIssueIDs()
+	countsMap := make(map[int64]int, len(issueIDs))
+	counts := make([]struct {
+		IssueID int64
+		Count   int
+	}, 0, len(issueIDs))
+	if err := db.GetEngine(ctx).Select("issue_id, count(*) as count").
+		Table("comment").In("issue_id", issueIDs).And("type = ?", CommentTypeReview).
+		GroupBy("issue_id").Find(&counts); err != nil {
+		return nil, err
+	}
+	for _, c := range counts {
+		countsMap[c.IssueID] = c.Count
+	}
+	return countsMap, nil
+}
+
+func (prs PullRequestList) LoadReviews(ctx context.Context) (ReviewList, error) {
+	issueIDs := prs.GetIssueIDs()
+	reviews := make([]*Review, 0, len(issueIDs))
+
+	subQuery := builder.Select("max(id) as id").
+		From("review").
+		Where(builder.In("issue_id", issueIDs)).
+		And(builder.In("`type`", ReviewTypeApprove, ReviewTypeReject, ReviewTypeRequest)).
+		And(builder.Eq{
+			"dismissed":          false,
+			"original_author_id": 0,
+			"reviewer_team_id":   0,
+		}).
+		GroupBy("issue_id, reviewer_id")
+	// Get latest review of each reviewer, sorted in order they were made
+	if err := db.GetEngine(ctx).In("id", subQuery).OrderBy("review.updated_unix ASC").Find(&reviews); err != nil {
+		return nil, err
+	}
+
+	teamReviewRequests := make([]*Review, 0, 5)
+	subQueryTeam := builder.Select("max(id) as id").
+		From("review").
+		Where(builder.In("issue_id", issueIDs)).
+		And(builder.Eq{
+			"original_author_id": 0,
+		}).And(builder.Neq{
+		"reviewer_team_id": 0,
+	}).
+		GroupBy("issue_id, reviewer_team_id")
+	if err := db.GetEngine(ctx).In("id", subQueryTeam).OrderBy("review.updated_unix ASC").Find(&teamReviewRequests); err != nil {
+		return nil, err
+	}
+
+	if len(teamReviewRequests) > 0 {
+		reviews = append(reviews, teamReviewRequests...)
+	}
+
+	return reviews, nil
+}
+
 // HasMergedPullRequestInRepo returns whether the user(poster) has merged pull-request in the repo
 func HasMergedPullRequestInRepo(ctx context.Context, repoID, posterID int64) (bool, error) {
 	return db.GetEngine(ctx).

models/issues/pull_list_test.go

@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+// Copyright 2024 The Gitea Authors. All rights reserved.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
+
+package issues_test
+
+import (
+	"testing"
+
+	"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/db"
+	issues_model "code.gitea.io/gitea/models/issues"
+	"code.gitea.io/gitea/models/unittest"
+
+	"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
+)
+
+func TestPullRequestList_LoadAttributes(t *testing.T) {
+	assert.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
+
+	prs := []*issues_model.PullRequest{
+		unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.PullRequest{ID: 1}),
+		unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.PullRequest{ID: 2}),
+	}
+	assert.NoError(t, issues_model.PullRequestList(prs).LoadAttributes(db.DefaultContext))
+	for _, pr := range prs {
+		assert.NotNil(t, pr.Issue)
+		assert.Equal(t, pr.IssueID, pr.Issue.ID)
+	}
+
+	assert.NoError(t, issues_model.PullRequestList([]*issues_model.PullRequest{}).LoadAttributes(db.DefaultContext))
+}
+
+func TestPullRequestList_LoadReviewCommentsCounts(t *testing.T) {
+	assert.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
+
+	prs := []*issues_model.PullRequest{
+		unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.PullRequest{ID: 1}),
+		unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.PullRequest{ID: 2}),
+	}
+	reviewComments, err := issues_model.PullRequestList(prs).LoadReviewCommentsCounts(db.DefaultContext)
+	assert.NoError(t, err)
+	assert.Len(t, reviewComments, 2)
+	for _, pr := range prs {
+		assert.EqualValues(t, reviewComments[pr.IssueID], 1)
+	}
+}
+
+func TestPullRequestList_LoadReviews(t *testing.T) {
+	assert.NoError(t, unittest.PrepareTestDatabase())
+
+	prs := []*issues_model.PullRequest{
+		unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.PullRequest{ID: 1}),
+		unittest.AssertExistsAndLoadBean(t, &issues_model.PullRequest{ID: 2}),
+	}
+	reviewList, err := issues_model.PullRequestList(prs).LoadReviews(db.DefaultContext)
+	assert.NoError(t, err)
+	// 1, 7, 8, 9, 10, 22
+	assert.Len(t, reviewList, 6)
+	assert.EqualValues(t, 1, reviewList[0].ID)
+	assert.EqualValues(t, 7, reviewList[1].ID)
+	assert.EqualValues(t, 8, reviewList[2].ID)
+	assert.EqualValues(t, 9, reviewList[3].ID)
+	assert.EqualValues(t, 10, reviewList[4].ID)
+	assert.EqualValues(t, 22, reviewList[5].ID)
+}