Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FR: consolidation and/or better documentation for docker images #1940

Open
shollyman opened this issue Mar 15, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

FR: consolidation and/or better documentation for docker images #1940

shollyman opened this issue Mar 15, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.

Comments

@shollyman
Copy link
Contributor

shollyman commented Mar 15, 2024

While making a minor improvement to synthtool templates to improve python testing, I discovered that in addition to the testing docker image we build from https://github.com/googleapis/testing-infra-docker there's also an image built here in synthtool:

https://github.com/googleapis/synthtool/blob/master/synthtool/gcp/templates/python_library/.kokoro/docker/docs/Dockerfile

Both images are necessary for successfully testing our library repos, so this feels like an opportunity to improve how the images are built/maintained with some consolidation. If nothing else, some reference information that details where images definitions live and their associated gcr.io tags would be helpful for the next person, as I don't know what additional images may be relevant to document.

@chingor13 chingor13 added type: cleanup An internal cleanup or hygiene concern. type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design. and removed type: cleanup An internal cleanup or hygiene concern. labels Aug 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants