-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support for s390x Architecture #3982
Comments
Hi @Praveenmail2him, Currently, there is no support for The main blockers I see are:
So, what I'd suggest you is to give it a try, either by trying to build k6 locally for that architecture, or setting up your own fork. It may happen the unlikely situation that, if adding support for this architecture is relatively demanded (with 👍🏻 on this issue), and the overhead of maintaining this new architecture is super low, we could extend the support, but that would be in a non-near future, and under very specific conditions. For now, try to explore it on your own, if really interested, and let us know the results. Thanks! 🙇🏻 Side note(@Praveenmail2him): If you only wanted to ask the question for information, and not to ask and pursue that support, then I'd suggest you to close this issue, and next time try to use the k6 community for this kind of questions, as GitHub issues are mainly used for reporting feature requests, enhancements and bugs. |
I would like to build the support for s390x Architecture, let me fork this code. |
Hey @Praveenmail2him, If you want to get it supported natively by k6, then you should provide more context here explaining why this should be important, otherwise there are high chance that we could reject the contribution. I close this issue as I assume you are going to only fork the project as you mentioned in your comment. In any case, feel free to post the link here of the forked version to reach a wider user base. You don't need to re-open you can comment on closed issues. |
My team is working on to provide the z support for this tool. I'm going to fork this code and make some changes to accommodate s390x architecture. I will submit a PR. |
Feature Description
Is there any support available for s390x architecture?
Suggested Solution (optional)
No response
Already existing or connected issues / PRs (optional)
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: