labels of larger historic=archaeological_site should be larger

[matkoniecz]

see for example Forum Romanum label: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1841080#map=17/41.89145/12.49100

[matkoniecz]

Maybe large areas should be displayed solely with label, without icon. Not tested but it would work well at least in that case.

[matthijsmelissen]

Very similar to #1019, but also related to #1355.

[matkoniecz]

Very similar to #1019

Also #1020, #1022, #1052

[Circeus]

Unless I'm mistaken, none of the labels that have accompanying icon were ever implemented using pixelarea, even though it would be obviously a good idea. The problem presumably that icons were barely starting to move to svg?

A single issue covering this should probably be created.

Am I crazy or does this one include a bunch of smaller sites inside the big one?

[matkoniecz]

does this one include a bunch of smaller sites inside the big one

Yes, what worse in that case this tagging is not wrong.

[Tomasz-W]

@kocio-pl Please close this ticket as duplicate.
Continue further discussion in #3284