-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 104
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New version of gem with Ruby 2.4.x support #61
Comments
i hereby support this issue. |
@milgner Are you able to release a |
@tessie Can you assist with this? |
@joschi could you please help? |
After merging many changes, I'd have liked to run the current master in a staging environment for a bit, logging to a real system before releasing a new version. I'll give it a try today, if no immediate problems pop up, I'll create a release over the weekend. |
@milgner Maybe the other commenters here in this issue can help with testing if you release a beta/release candidate. |
@milgner Are you able to share with us how the tests went? Can we expect an updated release soon? |
Paging @edmundoa @jalogisch @joschi @lennartkoopmann @AlekSi @bernd @milgner Apologies if this is considered poor etiquette, but we could really use some help/feedback here. |
I haven't received any additional feedback and unfortunately the tests I could do were a bit limited. I propose releasing a version labeled RC1. This way, even if you don't want to point your Gemfile to Github, you can already use the new features from an official gem version. |
@milgner If you do that today, I can test it in a real environment today 👍 Desperately need this since we're just migrating some legacy code to newer Ruby+Rails. |
@milgner Do let me know if you need any help. |
@alex-mohemian I pushed a new version tag this morning but so far it doesn't seem to have been picked up by the release automatism. Currently busy on my day job and don't know whether I'll find some time this evening. @tessie if you could find some time to check out why pushing the tag did not result in a new version being published, that would be really great! |
Sure
Would check
…On Thu, 14 Jun 2018, 17:42 Marcus Ilgner, ***@***.***> wrote:
@alex-mohemian <https://github.com/alex-mohemian> I pushed a new version
tag this morning but so far it doesn't seem to have been picked up by the
release automatism. Currently busy on my day job and don't know whether
I'll find some time this evening.
@tessie <https://github.com/tessie> if you could find some time to check
out why pushing the tag did not result in a new version being published,
that would be really great!
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#61 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACp8j_H0aQpqOeYBRDASQXKlVHmFm1I2ks5t8lMvgaJpZM4PEMTO>
.
|
@milgner is there a |
@alex-mohemian I did publish a tag for a release a couple of weeks ago but somehow it wasn't published correctly. I'll have to check the configuration again, something seems to be broken in the publishing process. |
@milgner the |
@alex-mohemian ah, that is good to know. I was going by the information on rubygems.org which still shows |
I'm sorry, my mistake. Yes, Looking forward for the |
@milgner Is there anything I could do to help you get the |
Since I'm not sure what the actual problem was, I'll go ahead and push another tag for 3.1 and see what happens. There might have been a problem with the version ordering among |
@alex-mohemian that's great to hear! I struggled a bit with the old jeweler version not being able to regularly bump the version. @tessie already prepared a dependency version bump in #66 but unfortunately new versions of jeweler break compatibility with old Rubies... 😬 |
It will be really nice to release a new version of gem with the latest commits included (#55).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: