You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
First, I'd like to thank you and congratulate on the amazing work you did.
I have some doubts regarding the Noiseprint++ training and would really appreciate your help. You mention that data was obtained from platforms DPReview and Flickr. However, both platforms contain huge amounts of data, so it would be helpful if you could provide information on which exact datasets/galleries were used.
I would also like to ask about Noiseprint++ training procedure itself. In the original Noiseprint paper, the batches of 200 patches were split into 50 internally homogeneous groups (which are heterogeneous with respect to each other). Does Noiseprint++ also works in a similar approach?
Thank you in advance!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi!
First, I'd like to thank you and congratulate on the amazing work you did.
I have some doubts regarding the Noiseprint++ training and would really appreciate your help. You mention that data was obtained from platforms DPReview and Flickr. However, both platforms contain huge amounts of data, so it would be helpful if you could provide information on which exact datasets/galleries were used.
I would also like to ask about Noiseprint++ training procedure itself. In the original Noiseprint paper, the batches of 200 patches were split into 50 internally homogeneous groups (which are heterogeneous with respect to each other). Does Noiseprint++ also works in a similar approach?
Thank you in advance!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: