You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Let's say I make a signpost metatile on my primary set on the middle layer. Its bottom layer is grass or something.
Now I have a secondary set that's got some special orange grass, and I put that same signpost in the secondary set on top of that orange grass.
Then at some point I edit a pixel or two on the signpost on one of the two sets, but at this point I've forgotten about the identical signpost on the other set.
I have no idea how easily doable a warning when two metatiles (16x16) are almost identical but not quite would be. A "hey are you sure this is intentional?" sort of thing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It's very doable actually. There's this concept in text processing called Levenshtein distance. If I can come up with a clever way to represent a particular metatile layer as text, then I can probably use something like this to warn the user when it detects two tiles that are within a certain distance threshold, as that probably indicates a user mistake of some sort.
Let's say I make a signpost metatile on my primary set on the middle layer. Its bottom layer is grass or something.
Now I have a secondary set that's got some special orange grass, and I put that same signpost in the secondary set on top of that orange grass.
Then at some point I edit a pixel or two on the signpost on one of the two sets, but at this point I've forgotten about the identical signpost on the other set.
I have no idea how easily doable a warning when two metatiles (16x16) are almost identical but not quite would be. A "hey are you sure this is intentional?" sort of thing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: