Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Substitutions inside tables break #99

Open
LinuxJedi opened this issue Apr 26, 2015 · 4 comments
Open

Substitutions inside tables break #99

LinuxJedi opened this issue Apr 26, 2015 · 4 comments
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@LinuxJedi
Copy link

When using substitutions inside table (the |substitute| format) riv breaks the substitution and table layout, it appears to be thinking that the pipes were part of the table design.

@matclab
Copy link

matclab commented Mar 31, 2016

That's the same for preformatted block using |.

@gu-fan gu-fan added the TODO label Jan 21, 2018
@gu-fan gu-fan added this to the TABLE milestone Jan 21, 2018
@tron5
Copy link

tron5 commented Jul 26, 2019

Dear gu-fan!
The problem is really annoying, especially for big tables!

The line-parsing seems to be a little bit to "strong" for pipe-signs, i think.
Could it be possible, to parse for something like / | / instead of /|/ - consider the spaces arround the pipe? (i'am not good in python, so i did not find the right place for do that)
This way, it could be possible, to write something like [paramA|paramB|paramC] inside a table-cell, without break the columns formatting.

Hope, you can fix it soon - we need it.

Kind regards from Germany :)

@gour
Copy link

gour commented Nov 8, 2019

I apologize for creating another ticket #146 with the same issue, but I agree with @tron5 - it's very important for me, kind of deal-breaker between using rst or asciidoc!

@databill
Copy link

That's the same for preformatted block using |.

Same requirement!
Hope it can be fixed soon.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants